Finding twin Earths is harder than we thought
Astronomers need a handful of transits to decipher a planet's atmosphere and possibly confirm the existence of the first twin Earth.
March 24, 2009
Provided by the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, Massachusetts
March 24, 2009
This artist's conception shows a hypothetical twin Earth orbiting a Sun-like star. A new study shows that characterizing a distant Earth's atmosphere will be difficult, even using next-generation technology like the James Webb Space Telescope. If an earthlike world is nearby, though, then by adding observations of a number of transits, astronomers should be able to detect biomarkers like methane or ozone.
Photo by David A. Aguilar (CfA)
Does a twin Earth exist somewhere in our galaxy? Astronomers are getting closer and closer to finding an Earth-sized planet in an earthlike orbit. NASA's Kepler spacecraft just launched to find such worlds. Once the search succeeds, the next questions driving research will be: Is that planet habitable? Does it have an earthlike atmosphere? Answering those questions will not be easy.
Due to its large mirror and location in outer space, the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) (scheduled for launch in 2013) will offer astronomers the first real possibility of finding those answers. In a new study, Lisa Kaltenegger from Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and Wesley Traub from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, examined the ability of JWST to characterize the atmospheres of hypothetical earthlike planets during a transit - when part of the light of the star gets filtered through the planet's atmosphere. They found that JWST would be able to detect certain gases called biomarkers, such as ozone and methane, only for the closest Earth-sized worlds.
"We'll have to be lucky to decipher an earthlike planet's atmosphere during a transit event so that we can tell it is earthlike," said Kaltenegger. "We will need to add up many transits to do so - hundreds of them, even for stars as close as 20 light-years away."
"Even though it's hard, it will be an incredibly exciting endeavor to characterize a distant planet's atmosphere," she said.
In a transit event, a distant, extrasolar planet crosses in front of its star as seen from Earth. As the planet transits, gases in its atmosphere absorb a tiny fraction of the star's light, leaving fingerprints specific to each gas. By splitting the star's light into a rainbow of colors or spectrum, astronomers can look for those fingerprints. Kaltenegger and Traub studied whether those fingerprints would be detectable by JWST.
The transit technique is very challenging. If Earth were the size of a basketball, the atmosphere would be as thin as a sheet of paper, so the resulting signal is incredibly tiny. Moreover, this method only works when the planet is in front of its star, and each transit lasts for a few hours.
Kaltenegger and Traub first considered an earthlike world orbiting a Sun-like star. To get a detectable signal from a single transit, the star and planet would have to be extremely close to Earth. The only Sun-like star close enough is Alpha Centauri A. No such world has been found yet, but technology is only now becoming capable of detecting Earth-size worlds.
The study also considered planets orbiting red dwarf stars. Such stars, called type M, are the most abundant in the Milky Way - far more common than yellow, type G stars like the Sun. They are also cooler and dimmer than the Sun, as well as smaller, which makes finding an earthlike planet transiting an M star easier.
An earthlike world would have to orbit close to a red dwarf to be warm enough for liquid water. As a result, the planet would orbit more quickly and each transit would last a couple of hours to mere minutes. But it would undergo more transits in a given amount of time. Astronomers could improve their chances of detecting the atmosphere by adding the signal from several transits, making red dwarf stars appealing targets because of their more frequent transits.
An earthlike world orbiting a star like the Sun would undergo a 10-hour transit once every year. Accumulating 100 hours of transit observations would take 10 years. In contrast, an earth orbiting a mid-sized red dwarf star would undergo a 1-hour transit once every 10 days. Accumulating 100 hours of transit observations would take less than 3 years.
"Nearby red dwarf stars offer the best possibility of detecting biomarkers in a transiting earth's atmosphere," said Kaltenegger.
"Ultimately, direct imaging - studying photons of light from the planet itself - may prove a more powerful method of characterizing the atmosphere of earthlike worlds than the transit technique," said Traub.
Both NASA's Spitzer and Hubble Space Telescopes have studied the atmospheric compositions of extremely hot, gas-giant extrasolar planets. The characterization of a "pale blue dot" is the next step from there, whether by adding up hundreds of transits of one planet or by blocking out the starlight and analyzing the planet's light directly.
In a best-case scenario, Alpha Centauri A may turn out to have a transiting Earthlike planet that no one has spotted yet. Then, astronomers would need only a handful of transits to decipher that planet's atmosphere and possibly confirm the existence of the first twin Earth.
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content.
Learn more »