Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

First galaxies were born much earlier than expected

The newly discovered galaxy indicates that these star cities were forming about 200 million years after the Big Bang.
By Hubble ESA, Garching, Germany Published: April 12, 2011
Abell-383
The giant cluster of elliptical galaxies in the center of this image contains so much dark matter mass that its gravitational field bends light. This means that for distant galaxies in the background, the cluster acts as a magnifying glass, bending and concentrating the distant object’s light towards Hubble. These gravitational lenses are one tool astronomers can use to extend Hubble’s vision beyond what it would normally be capable of seeing. NASA/ESA/J. Richard (CRAL) and J.P. Kneib (LAM); acknowledgement: Marc Postman (STScI)
Using the amplifying power of a cosmic gravitational lens, astronomers have discovered a distant galaxy whose stars were born unexpectedly early in cosmic history. This result sheds new light on the formation of the first galaxies as well as on the early evolution of the universe.

"We have discovered a distant galaxy that began forming stars just 200 million years after the Big Bang,” said Johan Richard from the Observatoire de Lyon, France. “This challenges theories of how soon galaxies formed and evolved in the first years of the universe. It could even help solve the mystery of how the hydrogen fog that filled the early universe was cleared."

Richard's team spotted the galaxy in recent observations from the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, verified it with observations from the NASA Spitzer Space Telescope, and measured its distance using the W. M. Keck Observatory in Hawaii.

The distant galaxy is visible through a cluster of galaxies called Abell 383, whose powerful gravity bends the rays of light almost like a magnifying glass. The chance alignment of the galaxy allowed the cluster and Earth to amplify the light reaching us from this distant galaxy, allowing the astronomers to make detailed observations. Without this gravitational lens, the galaxy would have been too faint to be observed even with today's largest telescopes.

After spotting the galaxy in Hubble and Spitzer images, the team carried out spectroscopic observations with the Keck-II telescope in Hawaii. Spectroscopy is the technique of breaking up light into its component colors. By analyzing these spectra, the team was able to make detailed measurements of its redshift and infer information about the properties of its component stars.

The galaxy's redshift is 6.027, which means we see it as it was when the universe was around 950 million years old. This does not make it the most remote galaxy ever detected — several have been confirmed at redshifts of more than 8, and one has an estimated redshift of around 10, placing it 400 million years earlier. However, the newly discovered galaxy has dramatically different features from other distant galaxies that have been observed, which generally shine brightly with only young stars.

"When we looked at the spectra, two things were clear," said Eiichi Egami from the University of Arizona. "The redshift placed it very early in cosmic history, as we expected. But the Spitzer infrared detection also indicated that the galaxy was made up of surprisingly old and relatively faint stars. This told us that the galaxy was made up of stars already nearly 750 million years old — pushing back the epoch of its formation to about 200 million years after the Big Bang, much further than we had expected."

"Thanks to the amplification of the galaxy's light by the gravitational lens, we have some excellent quality data,” said Dan Stark from the University of Cambridge, United Kingdom. “Our work confirms some earlier observations that had hinted at the presence of old stars in early galaxies. This suggests that the first galaxies have been around for a lot longer than previously thought."

The discovery has implications beyond the question of when galaxies first formed, and may help explain how the universe became transparent to ultraviolet light in the first billion years after the Big Bang. In the early years of the cosmos, a diffuse fog of neutral hydrogen gas blocked ultraviolet light in the universe. Some source of radiation must therefore have progressively ionized the diffuse gas, clearing the fog to make it transparent to ultraviolet rays, as it is today — a process known as reionization.

Astronomers believe that the radiation that powered this reionization must have come from galaxies. But so far, not enough of them have been found to provide the necessary radiation. This discovery may help solve this enigma.

"It seems probable that there are in fact far more galaxies out there in the early universe than we previously estimated. It's just that many galaxies are older and fainter, like the one we have just discovered," said Jean-Paul Kneib from the Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille, France. "If this unseen army of faint, elderly galaxies is indeed out there, they could provide the missing radiation that made the universe transparent to ultraviolet light."

As of today, scientists can only discover these galaxies by observing through massive clusters that act as cosmic telescopes. In coming years, the NASA/ESA/CSA James Webb Space Telescope, scheduled for launch later this decade, will specialize in high-resolution observations of distant, highly redshifted objects. It will therefore be in an ideal position to solve this mystery once and for all.

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
5 stars
FRANK VOLPE IV from NEVADA said:
I am happy to be alive in a time when are able to explore and discover in these humanly unfathomable distances. I am also sad and most of all jealous knowing how much my limited lifespan will miss out on in the centuries to come. Or not... given how modern physics are exploring ideas of time travel. Stay tuned.
JOHN MOES from MICHIGAN said:
“The newly discovered galaxy indicates that these star cities were forming about 200 million years after the Big Bang.
The galaxy's redshift is 6.027, which means we see it as it was when the universe was around 950 million years old.”

At a redshift of 6.037, the space between the newly discovered galaxy, A, and M (ours) had expanded less than 200 million light years in 200 million years. And at that point in history the cluster, Abell 383, was between A and M. If the diameter of Abell 383 was about the same as the Coma cluster (7 Mpc), there was a lot less space between the Abell 383 cluster and us then. It must have been like one big cluster splitting up into pieces hardly identifiable as galaxies and clusters.
Also, for every photon that galaxy A emitted in our direction it emitted another in the opposite direction which about right now is hitting a planet around a sun in a galaxy B. In the year 200 million PBB, B and M were less than 400 million light years apart, with A being half way between. But even though B was less than 400 million light years away, at a redshift of twice 6.027, none of its light has ever reached M. And some of B’s light is just now reaching A and galaxy C, 180 degrees from A, which in 200 Million PBB was 600 million light years from M.
3 stars
JOHN HIGBEE said:
I am flat-out amazed by the deduction going on here. It amazes me and makes me feel like a dunce at the same time.
5 stars
TIM FORREST from NORTH CAROLINA said:
Ahhh, to learn new things about the universe!!!
5 stars
MR LUCKY COMUNALE from TENNESSEE said:
Thanx Cosmology &JWST.R Rumors true thatJWST won't "fly"?We would be disappointed.Any chance of ensuring it stays funded & could perhaps be speeded up!We think spending more on Astronomy,cosmology,astrophysics,the sciences,Exploration & expeditions are worthy.Spend less on war,Government,& extra costs by delays. Lets consider other cuts & speed up our study of the universe!
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me