Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

Astronomers discover that galaxies are either asleep or awake

The research indicates that galaxies quickly go from actively forming stars to shutting off.
By Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut Published: June 22, 2011
Blue and red galaxies
Bluer galaxies are actively “awake” and forming stars, while redder galaxies have shut down and are “asleep.” NASA/ESA/S. Beckwith (STScI)/the HUDF team)
Astronomers have probed into the distant universe and discovered that galaxies display one of two distinct behaviors: They are either awake or asleep, actively forming stars or not forming any new stars at all.

Scientists have known for several years that galaxies in the nearby universe seem to fall into one of these two states. But a new survey of the distant universe shows that even young galaxies as far away as 12 billion light-years are either awake or asleep as well, meaning galaxies have behaved this way for more than 85 percent of the history of the universe. Looking at galaxies farther away is like looking back in time when they were much younger because of how long it takes the light they emit to reach us.

“The fact that we see such young galaxies in the distant universe that have already shut off is remarkable,” said Kate Whitaker from Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.

In order to determine whether the galaxies were asleep or awake, Whitaker and her colleagues fabricated a new set of filters, each one sensitive to different wavelengths of light, which they used on a 4-meter Kitt Peak telescope in Arizona. They spent 75 nights peering into the distant universe and collecting light from 40,000 galaxies ranging in distance from the nearby universe out to 12 billion light-years away. The resulting survey is the deepest and most complete ever made at those distances and wavelengths of light.

The team deciphered the galaxies’ dual behavior based on the color of the light they emit. Because of the physics of star formation, active, wakeful galaxies appear bluer, while the light emitted by passive, sleepy galaxies tends toward the redder end of the spectrum.

The researchers found that there are many more active galaxies than passive ones, which agrees with the current thinking that galaxies start out actively forming stars before eventually shutting down.

“We don’t see many galaxies in the in-between state,” said Pieter van Dokkum from Yale. “This discovery shows how quickly galaxies go from one state to the other, from actively forming stars to shutting off.”

Whether the sleeping galaxies have completely shut down remains an open question, Whitaker said. However, the new study suggests the active galaxies are forming stars at rates about 50 times greater than their sleepy counterparts.

“Next, we hope to determine whether galaxies go back and forth between waking and sleeping or whether they fall asleep and never wake up again,” van Dokkum said. “We’re also interested in how long it takes galaxies to fall asleep, and whether we can catch one in the act of dozing off.”

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
3 stars
PETER OWENS said:
Not so surprising when we carefully consider what we know for sure & what we do not
Back to the drawing board (again).
5 stars
BILL SIMPSON from LOUISIANA said:
It must be related to the density of the region of space where the galaxies first formed. Galaxy collisions could have some impact on the rate of star formation. Dark matter and energy might do something too.
WAYNE CRIBBIN said:
If thats the case what causes the change of state? There must be something present or missing to switch a Galaxly from an asleep state to awake, and vice versa.
FIVISH FIVISH said:
So distant galaxies behave the same as nearby ones. What a surprise! More evidence then for a universe that is infinite in time and space. Excellent work from Yale. But will they recognise the full implications of their work or will they file it away with the numerous other inconvenient truths?
4 stars
FORREST NOBLE from CALIFORNIA said:
"The research indicates that galaxies quickly go from actively forming stars to shutting off."

--from the title

This conclusion is based upon the standard model and what is believed to be the correct age of the light (up to 12billion years old). If instead these galaxies are as old as local galaxies then they would be older galaxies that took a long time to "shut down."

"The fact that we see such young galaxies in the distant universe that have already shut off is remarkable,” said Kate Whitaker

This quote shows the realization that the assumption of the galaxies age and what they seem to be observing do not fit together. This I think is because the dormant galaxies being observed at these distances are older galaxies that one would expect to have shut down, leading to the obvious conclusion if this statement is valid, that the standard model is the incorrect model of the universe.

There has been much evidence concerning numerous papers before and after the Hubble went up, that many distant galaxies appear to be as old as our own galaxy or others even older appearing galaxies in our vicinity.

I believe that within a few years after the James Webb telescope goes up that we will see continuously the same things that was seen with the Hubble space telescope. At that time I hope that theorists will start seriously looking around for a better cosmological model that allows for older galaxies at these distances.
5 stars
SUSAN FALL from MASSACHUSETTS said:
Fascinating!
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me