Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

Mission suggests Sun and planets constructed differently

Although the differences in oxygen and nitrogen are slight, the implications could help determine how our solar system evolved.
By NASA/JPL Published: June 24, 2011
genesis-illustration
Artist rendering of the Genesis spacecraft during collection phase of mission. NASA/JPL-Caltech
Researchers analyzing samples returned by NASA’s 2004 Genesis mission have discovered that our Sun and its inner planets may have formed differently than previously thought.

Data revealed differences between the Sun and planets in oxygen and nitrogen, which are two of the most abundant elements in our solar system. Although the difference is slight, the implications could help determine how our solar system evolved.

“We found that Earth, the Moon, as well as martian and other meteorites, which are samples of asteroids, have a lower concentration of O-16 than does the Sun,” said Kevin McKeegan from the University of California, Los Angeles. “The implication is that we did not form out of the same solar nebula materials that created the Sun — just how and why remains to be discovered.”

The air on Earth contains three different kinds of oxygen atoms, which are differentiated by the number of neutrons they contain. Nearly 100 percent of oxygen atoms in the solar system are composed of O-16, but there are also tiny amounts of more exotic oxygen isotopes called O-17 and O-18. Researchers studying the oxygen of Genesis samples found that the percentage of O-16 in the Sun is slightly higher than on Earth or on other terrestrial planets. The other isotopes’ percentages were slightly lower.

Another study detailed differences between the Sun and planets in the element nitrogen. Like oxygen, nitrogen has one isotope, N-14, that makes up nearly 100 percent of the atoms in the solar system, but there is also a tiny amount of N-15. Researchers studying the same samples saw that when compared to Earth’s atmosphere, nitrogen in the Sun and Jupiter has slightly more N-14, but 40 percent less N-15. Both the Sun and Jupiter appear to have the same nitrogen composition. As is the case for oxygen, Earth and the rest of the inner solar system are different in nitrogen.

“These findings show that all solar system objects, including the terrestrial planets, meteorites, and comets, are anomalous compared to the initial composition of the nebula from which the solar system formed,” said Bernard Marty from the Research Center of Petrographics and Geochemicals in France. “Understanding the cause of such a heterogeneity will impact our view on the formation of the solar system.”

Data was obtained from analysis of samples that Genesis collected from the solar wind or material ejected from the outer portion of the Sun.
This material can be thought of as a fossil of our nebula because the preponderance of scientific evidence suggests that the outer layer of our Sun has not changed measurably for billions of years.

“The Sun houses more than 99 percent of the material currently in our solar system, so it’s a good idea to get to know it better,” said Don Burnett from the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena. “While it was more challenging than expected, we have answered some important questions, and like all successful missions, generated plenty more.”

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
3 stars
CHARLES D SHUSTER from OHIO said:
The sun and Jupiter are large mass bodies. Rather than acting like a centrifuge tehy may act as a gravity well. The higher weight isotopes may have concentrated in the cores of these bodies over time so what is emitted into space is depleated in these isotopes. Everything could have formed from the same cloud, the sun and jupiter have depleated their outer regions of the heavier isotopes by moving them to the interrior where we can not detect them.
JOEL A THOMAS from CALIFORNIA said:
Can't the collapsing, spinning gas cloud (from which the sun forms) act like a centrifuge causing an enrichment of the heavier isotopes on the outside (light planets, asteroids) and lighter isotopes on the inside (sun)? The same mechanism may account for heavy Jupiter's enrichment of light isotopes.
BILL SIMPSON from LOUISIANA said:
These findings, if correct, are really strange. Like where did the inner planets come from? Were they somehow captured rather than formed? That seems highly unlikely. This whole story seems impossible. It is as if elements were centrifuged, like trying to separate uranium isotopes. Theories please.
I can't imagine the chemistry needed to produce the data.
The late night comedians did have fun with the crash. NASA was lucky it had rained and softened the Utah ground that it slammed into when the parachute failed to open. NASA said that it malfunctioned, or something like that. No NASA, it crashed, but wasn't destroyed. It is amazing that they were able to make this discovery after the crash tore it open and damaged some of the interior plates. I can remember when they said that a helicopter was going to catch it in mid air, that it was never going to happen. It didn't. I was worried about a helicopter crashing trying to catch the thing. It might be a good thing that the parachute didn't open.
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me