Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

NASA's next Mars rover to land at Gale Crater

Curiosity is scheduled to launch late this year and land in August 2012.
By NASA/JPL Published: July 26, 2011
Gale-crater
This computer-generated view based on multiple orbital observations shows Mars' Gale crater as if seen from an aircraft northwest of the crater. NASA/JPL-Caltech/ASU/UA
NASA’s next Mars rover will land at the foot of a layered mountain inside the planet’s Gale Crater.

The car-sized Mars Science Laboratory (MSL), Curiosity, is scheduled to launch late this year and land in August 2012. The target crater spans 96 miles (154 kilometers) in diameter and holds a mountain rising higher from the crater floor than Mount Rainier rises above Seattle, Washington. Gale is about the combined area of Connecticut and Rhode Island. Layering in the mound suggests it is the surviving remnant of an extensive sequence of deposits. The crater is named for Australian astronomer Walter F. Gale.

“Mars is firmly in our sights,” said NASA Administrator Charles Bolden. “Curiosity not only will return a wealth of important science data, but it will serve as a precursor mission for human exploration to the Red Planet.”

During a prime mission lasting 1 martian year — nearly 2 Earth years — researchers will use the rover’s tools to study whether the landing region had favorable environmental conditions for supporting microbial life and for preserving clues about whether life ever existed.

“Scientists identified Gale as their top choice to pursue the ambitious goals of this new rover mission,” said Jim Green from NASA Headquarters in Washington, D.C. “The site offers a visually dramatic landscape and also great potential for significant science findings.”

In 2006, more than 100 scientists began to consider about 30 potential landing sites during worldwide workshops. Four candidates were selected in 2008. An abundance of targeted images enabled thorough analysis of the safety concerns and scientific attractions of each site. A team of senior NASA science officials then conducted a detailed review and unanimously agreed to move forward with the MSL Science Team’s recommendation. The team is composed of a host of principal and co-investigators on the project.

Curiosity is about twice as long and more than 5 times as heavy as any previous Mars rover. Its 10 science instruments include two for ingesting and analyzing samples of powdered rock that the rover’s robotic arm collects. A radioisotope power source will provide heat and electric power to the rover. A rocket-powered sky crane suspending Curiosity on tethers will lower the rover directly to the martian surface.

The portion of the crater where Curiosity will land has an alluvial fan likely formed by water-carried sediments. The layers at the base of the mountain contain clays and sulfates, both known to form in water.

“One fascination with Gale is that it’s a huge crater sitting in a low-elevation position on Mars, and we all know that water runs downhill,” said John Grotzinger from the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena. “In terms of the total vertical profile exposed and the low elevation, Gale offers attractions similar to Mars’ famous Valles Marineris, the largest canyon in the solar system.”

Curiosity will go beyond the “follow-the-water” strategy of recent Mars exploration. The rover’s science payload can identify other ingredients of life, such as the carbon-based building blocks of biology called organic compounds. Long-term preservation of organic compounds requires special conditions. Certain minerals, including some Curiosity may find in the clay and sulfate-rich layers near the bottom of Gale’s mountain, are good at latching onto organic compounds and protecting them from oxidation.

“Gale gives us attractive possibilities for finding organics, but that is still a long shot,” said Michael Meyer from NASA’s Mars Exploration Program at agency headquarters. “What adds to Gale’s appeal is that, organics or not, the site holds a diversity of features and layers for investigating changing environmental conditions, some of which could inform a broader understanding of habitability on ancient Mars.”

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
DANNY HENDERSON from IDAHO said:
Maybe I'm totally way off base somewhere, but here on Earth we use military spy satelites in a Geo-syncronous stationary orbit above the Earth to spy upon our enemies and other countries. These spy satelites supposedly can zoom up or down and supposedly read a news paper over someones shoulder or read a license plate on a car, or zoom outward and scan the surface of the ground at a wider angle. My point is - Why can't we do this same thing on mars or the moon and scan and photgraph the whole surface just to see what we may find on the surface whether it be nothing but dirt and rocks, or water, or who knows ancient buildings maybe? This satelite could be placed in an orbit so that it eventually photographs and covers the whole surface of mars or the moon. But like I said I'm not a rocket scientist etc. and am probably way off base on this possibly being done.
5 stars
JAMES PIERCE from TENNESSEE said:
with curiosity being much larger would assume it would cover alot more area and that would increase the likely hood of finding anything its looking for.too bad it couldnt fly around then it could really cover a big area.
4 stars
BILL SIMPSON from LOUISIANA said:
It will be the greatest surprise of my life if we discovered evidence of life on Mars. It would be one of the greatest discoveries in human history, but it seems to me that the odds are very much against it. I'm certainly no expert of the red planet, but it seems to have lost any atmosphere it had long ago. Just because it had water, and still has water today, doesn't mean it ever had an atmosphere that was conducive to life. Think of the Moon. Water, but no life.
The thing that it would be nice to know is what kind of atmosphere did Mars once have, and when did it lose it. The mechanism of atmospheric loss seems to revolve around the behavior and composition of the planet's core. The weak magnetic field seems to have allowed the solar wind to gradually strip away the atmosphere. When did it disappear and what was its' original composition? As I understand it, Earth has an oxygen atmosphere that was made by life. The early Earth probably had an atmosphere of carbon dioxide, and methane. Mars was probably similar, like Venus is today. We may never know. The chances of life evolving in an atmosphere devoid of oxygen seems remote, although nothing is impossible. The deep ocean life found near volcanic vents proves that. Life is so complex that we may never figure out how it actually first forms. That could be a good thing if a complete understanding of life enabled the creation of dangerous life forms, either by accident, or purposefully.
If life did evolve on Mars, it may have survived to this very day. Any change in the atmosphere would probably have been gradual. That may have enabled any primitive creatures to adapt to the changing conditions. I would expect caves or craters to be the best place to search. (I don't volunteer. Bring really good flashlights.) Should life be found, it may cause problems for any explorers. Hopefully, it couldn't survive in an oxygen atmosphere, so it would be no threat if it was transported back to Earth someday.
I will be amazed if this lander actually makes it down to the Martian surface in operable condition. The previous rovers were quite small. This thing is far larger. The design is very complex. If I recall correctly, it is to be lowered from a rocket supported platform that first has to get through the Martian atmosphere without burning up. That sounds easy, but due to the high entry speed, is quite difficult. If all those parachutes open and detach properly, the rockets all fire perfectly, the wires uncoil without getting tangled or stuck on the reels, the cables all get cut simultaneously, it doesn't land on a big rock, it doesn't flip over on a steep slope, and the platform doesn't land on the lander, you will be able to say that the engineers deserve a bonus. Keep your fingers crossed that no big dust storm blows up as the lander arrives. I doubt the heat shield would survive the abrasion on the way down, but it might. It COULD work. Let us hope so. It has very cool wheels. And they tell us that they are strictly functional. Sure they are. How come the Russian ones always look like they were stamped out in Plant Number 8 from beryllium sheets?
Oh, and the launch rocket has to not blow up and the lander has to properly detach from it. Got a rabbit's foot?
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me