Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

Alien world is blacker than coal

TrES-2b lacks reflective clouds due to its high temperature.
By Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, Massachusetts Published: August 12, 2011
Exoplanet-TrES-2b
The distant exoplanet TrES-2b, shown here in an artist's conception, is darker than the blackest coal. This Jupiter-sized world reflects less than 1 percent of the light that falls on it, making it blacker than any planet or moon in our solar system. Astronomers aren't sure what vapors in the planet's superheated atmosphere cloak it so effectively. Image credit: David A. Aguilar (CfA)
Astronomers have discovered the darkest known exoplanet — a distant, Jupiter-sized gas giant known as TrES-2b. Their measurements show that TrES-2b reflects less than 1 percent of the sunlight falling on it, making it blacker than coal or any planet or moon in our solar system.

"TrES-2b is considerably less reflective than black acrylic paint, so it's truly an alien world," said David Kipping from the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

In our solar system, Jupiter is swathed in bright clouds of ammonia that reflect more than a third of the sunlight reaching it. In contrast, TrES-2b, which was discovered in 2006 by the Trans-Atlantic Exoplanet Survey (TrES), lacks reflective clouds due to its high temperature.

TrES-2b orbits its star at a distance of only 3 million miles (5 million kilometers). The star's intense light heats TrES-2b to a temperature of more than 1800° Fahrenheit (980° Celsius) — much too hot for ammonia clouds. Instead, its exotic atmosphere contains light-absorbing chemicals like vaporized sodium and potassium, or gaseous titanium oxide. Yet none of these chemicals fully explain the extreme blackness of TrES-2b.

"It's not clear what is responsible for making this planet so extraordinarily dark," said David Spiegel from Princeton University in New Jersey. "However, it's not completely pitch black. It's so hot that it emits a faint red glow, much like a burning ember or the coils on an electric stove."

Kipping and Spiegel determined the reflectivity of TrES-2b using data from NASA's Kepler spacecraft. Kepler is designed to measure the brightness of distant stars with extreme precision. The team monitored the brightness of the TrES-2 system as the planet orbited its star. They detected a subtle dimming and brightening due to the planet's changing phase.

Scientists believe TrES-2b is tidally locked like our Moon, so one side of the planet always faces the star. And like our Moon, the planet shows changing phases as it orbits its star. This causes the total brightness of the star plus planet to vary slightly.

"By combining the impressive precision from Kepler with observations of over 50 orbits, we detected the smallest-ever change in brightness from an exoplanet: just 6 parts per million," said Kipping. "In other words, Kepler was able to directly detect visible light coming from the planet itself." The extremely small fluctuations proved that TrES-2b is incredibly dark. A more reflective world would have shown larger brightness variations as its phase changed.

Kepler has located more than 1,200 planetary candidates in its field of view. Additional analysis will reveal whether any other unusually dark planets lurk in that data.

TrES-2b orbits the star GSC 03549-02811, which is located about 750 light-years away in the direction of the constellation Draco.

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
5 stars
ANN MURPHY from NORTH CAROLINA said:
Wow. For the planet to emit a reddish glow - very hot. Very interesting. It could have a nickname of Darth Vader planet.
5 stars
ASHIRA BROOKE from FLORIDA said:
I'm with Mathews, rename this planet Darth and/or Vader.

Secondly. . .wow. . . I learn so much from this magazine/website. Please keep it up. :D
3 stars
JOHN MURRELL said:
Albert,

It's a G0V dwarf fairly similar to the Sun according to the Sinbad database. Most of the Stars Kepler is looking at are similar to the Sun as they are presumed to have the greatest chance of an Earth like planet in orbit.
JON RISCH from MINNESOTA said:
Bill! Wow! Way beyond me but interesting.
4 stars
ALBERT W GLAZE from MARYLAND said:
What class star does TrES-2b orbit and is there any indication that it is a gas giant like Jupiter or evidence that could indicate that it has a solid surface. I'm sure further research would reveal answers to these questions. What's under the atmosphere could well answer the nature of it's darkness or absortion of light.
3 stars
R MATTHEWS from TEXAS said:
Please rename this planet Vader, or Darth. Yes, it's a good idea.
4 stars
BILL SIMPSON from LOUISIANA said:
Now you've got me wondering if it is as black as a crow? They shine a little, but not much. I often wonder why they are SO black? Evolution, no doubt. Not that it matters a lot, because these planets have to be a dime a dozen out there. If most stars have planets, which I would guess is the case, you will need to use scientific notation to write the total number of them. There might be more such planets out there than atoms that make up the Earth, but I doubt it. Atoms are unimaginably small. You can get an idea how small if you put a Geiger counter next to a radium painted clock dial from back in the 1950's. The old plastic ones with the radium painted hands are getting hard to find. As the counter approaches the radium, the clicks become continuous. Then you have to remember that what you are hearing is atoms splitting up and releasing energy. They have been doing that on the clock hand for 60 years, yet the paint looks the same. That demonstrates how tiny the atoms are. All those clicks and no change. And atoms are mostly empty space. All that time and they are still going strong. There are a LOT of them in there. Then reflect on a neutron star. That is one way to try and grasp how dense a neutron star is. I wonder how many neutrons you could fit within the space of a hydrogen atom where the electron normally orbits. I'll bet that would be a big number. Think how many neutrons you could fit inside a big atom like uranium. Those complex atoms made by supernova explosions have a lot of electron shells. You could fit a lot of neutrons inside all that empty space that makes up your typical atom. That is why the surface of a neutron star is the smoothest thing known. The tremendous gravity from all that matter won't allow anything to stick up. It makes me wonder how the neutrons are arranged around the entire surface. Are they perfectly packed around the whole star? Or could you find defects and irregular gaps between the neutrons. Wouldn't it be something if the entire surface was perfectly ordered so as to make the smallest possible sphere. Probably not, because it is constantly pulling in new gas from space and having to adjust its' surface continually as it slowly grows. If you could add one neutron at a time, all the rest might have to adjust. Or are they constantly shifting around from heat or other forces? I'll bet the space between the neutrons is interesting. Do they get distorted near the center? That is the beauty of math. They can calculate all that. Not that it is all that useful to know, at least not yet.
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me