Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

Three Americans share Nobel Prize in Physics

The researchers earned recognition for the discovery of the accelerating expansion of the universe through observations of distant supernovae.

By The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences Published: October 5, 2011
Perlmutter
Saul Perlmutter received half of the 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics for his Supernova Cosmology Project, which discovered that galaxies are receding from one another faster now than they were billions of years ago.
Photo by Roy Kaltschmidt (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory)
Riess-Schmidt
The other recipients of this year’s Nobel Prize were Adam Riess (left) and Brian Schmidt for their work on the High-z Supernova Search Team.
Photo by Riess: W. Kirk (The Johns Hopkins University) and STScI; Schmidt: AAP

The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has decided to award the Nobel Prize in Physics for 2011 with one half to Saul Perlmutter from the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and University of California, Berkeley, for his work on the Supernova Cosmology Project, and the other half to Brian P. Schmidt from the Australian National University and Adam G. Riess from the Johns Hopkins University and Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, for their work on the High-z Supernova Search Team .

What will be the final destiny of the universe? Probably it will end in ice, if we are to believe this year's Nobel Laureates in Physics. They have studied several dozen exploding stars, called supernovae, and discovered that the universe is expanding at an ever-accelerating rate. The discovery came as a complete surprise even to the Laureates themselves.

In 1998, cosmology was shaken at its foundations as two research teams presented their findings. Headed by Saul Perlmutter, one of the teams had set to work in 1988. Brian Schmidt headed another team, launched at the end of 1994, where Adam Riess was to play a crucial role.

The research teams raced to map the universe by locating the most distant supernovae. More sophisticated telescopes on the ground and in space, as well as more powerful computers and new digital imaging sensors (CCD, Nobel Prize in Physics in 2009), opened the possibility in the 1990s to add more pieces to the cosmological puzzle.

The teams used a particular kind of supernova, called a type Ia supernova, that is the explosion of an old compact star as heavy as the Sun but as small as the Earth. A single such supernova can emit as much light as a whole galaxy. All in all, the two research teams found more than 50 distant supernovae whose light was weaker than expected — this was a sign that the expansion of the universe was accelerating. The potential pitfalls had been numerous, and the scientists found reassurance in the fact that both groups had reached the same astonishing conclusion.

For almost a century, the universe has been known to be expanding as a consequence of the Big Bang 13.7 billion years ago. However, the discovery that this expansion is accelerating is astounding. If the expansion will continue to speed up, the universe will end in ice.

The acceleration is thought to be driven by dark energy, but what that dark energy is remains an enigma — perhaps the greatest in physics today. What is known is that dark energy constitutes about three-quarters of the universe. Therefore, the findings of the 2011 Nobel Laureates in Physics have helped to unveil a universe that to a large extent is unknown to science. And everything is possible again.

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
FRANK ATKINSON said:
I warmly applaud the observational work that Saul Perlmutter, Brian Schmidt and Adam Riess have carried out on supernovas and the accuracy of their data. It may well be that a Nobel Prize is merited for this alone, but it would appear that the Prize was awarded on the grounds of their work being interpreted to show that the Universe is expanding at an accelerating rate. Incongruously this can be said to be merely guesswork, because it is based on the prior guess that the Universe is actually expanding. It would seem reasonable to expect the elimination of prior guesswork relating to the expansion of the Universe before handing out Prizes. This would ensure the maintenance of the Prize's prestige, be given only for proven physics.

There isn't a single fact relied on in the argument that the Universe is expanding that does not have an alternative explanation contrary to the contention. Let us consider just some of those that relate to the redshift that is the core of the expansion theory. Firstly, we know that the redshift, that is to say, the stretching of the wavelength of the light from distant galaxies, is not due to the Doppler effect, (caused by matter passing through space). For that to work, we would have to be at the centre of the Universe. We have just spent several hundred years establishing that is not the case. The Doppler effect is the only proved effect that is caused by motion. There is no other proven method of using the redshift of light to show that the Universe is expanding. However, on realizing that the Doppler effect was a nonstarter, scientists put together a model called the cosmic redshift, in an attempt to make the redshift be a measure of a notional expansion. This relies on the expansion being produced by space itself stretching and pushing galaxies apart. The redshift is then said to be caused by a notional ability of the expanding space, to stretch the wavelength of light as the light passes through it. There is no method known to science for either space to stretch and expand or for it to be able to stretch light as it passes through it. The model is pure metaphysical speculation.

Secondly, notwithstanding that the cosmic redshift model is made up, it does not manage to do the job it was made up for. Back in 1929 Hubble discovered the coefficient of proportionality between the distance the light has travelled and the amount of redshift. Double the distance gives double the redshift, three times the distance gives three times the redshift and so on. However, the cosmic redshift model does not give this essential result. It gives the correct notional recessional velocity for the galaxies, but the light we rely on would not show this. Remember we are not dealing with the Doppler effect. The stretching of the light in transit cannot equate to the notional recessional velocity of its source. The stretching of the light would compound as it passed through space.

To show this, consider four galaxies all equidistant in a straight line, ABCD. Now send out a pulse of light from A towards D, and let its wavelength start at 1 cm. Let the expansion be such that the wavelength is doubled by the time it gets to B giving a redshift of 1. When the pulse of light passes B let a second pulse be sent off from B towards D, with the same wavelength of 1 cm. Now we have the situation that when the two pulses of light arrive at C, we find A to have its wavelength stretched to 4 cm, and B to 2 cm. Finally, as the two pulses of light pass C, let a third pulse be sent out from C towards D, with the same wavelength of 1 cm. When the three pulses of light arrive at D the light from C will have the correct redshit of 1, but that from B will have a redshift of 3 and not 2 as it should: and the light from A will have a redshift of 7 instead of 3. So instead of a progression 1,2,3 we have 1,3,7,15,31,63.

To sum up, the main planks in the argument for the expansion of the Universe as presently argued, are not viable. A fundamental rethink is required as to whether there is expansion at all. I have submitted an alternative model (see Paper on the Big Bang on the open access website www.tempofieldtheory.co.uk and the Book "Time - The Hidden Dimensions Of The Missing Physics",) suggesting that the Universe is static on the large scale, by virtue of the variation in time dilation throughout the Universe, which is a fundamental property of the Tempo field model.
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me