Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

Ancient lunar dynamo may explain magnetized Moon rocks

Recent analyses of Moon rocks, as well as orbital measurements of the magnetization of the lunar crust, suggest that there was a strong, long-lived magnetic field on the Moon early in its history.
By University of California - Santa Cruz Published: November 9, 2011
Moon
The Moon may have had a magnetic field early in its history. Credit: Monica Murphy
The presence of magnetized rocks on the surface of the Moon, which has no global magnetic field, has been a mystery since the days of the Apollo program. Now a team of scientists has proposed a novel mechanism that could have generated a magnetic field on the Moon early in its history.

The “geodynamo” that generates Earth’s magnetic field is powered by heat from the inner core, which drives complex fluid motions in the molten iron of the outer core. But the Moon is too small to support that type of dynamo, according to Christina Dwyer from the University of California, Santa Cruz. Dwyer, Francis Nimmo at UC Santa Cruz, and David Stevenson at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena describe how an ancient lunar dynamo could have arisen from stirring of the Moon’s liquid core driven by the motion of the solid mantle above it.

“This is a very different way of powering a dynamo that involves physical stirring, like stirring a bowl with a giant spoon,” Dwyer said.

Dwyer and her team calculated the effects of differential motion between the Moon’s core and mantle. Early in its history, the Moon orbited Earth at a much closer distance than it does today, and it continues to gradually recede from Earth. At close distances, tidal interactions between Earth and the Moon caused the Moon’s mantle to rotate slightly differently than the core. This differential motion of the mantle relative to the core stirred the liquid core, creating fluid motions that, in theory, could give rise to a magnetic dynamo.

“The Moon wobbles a bit as it spins – that’s called precession — but the core is liquid, and it doesn’t do exactly the same precession. So the mantle is moving back and forth across the core, and that stirs up the core,” said Nimmo.

The researchers found that a lunar dynamo could have operated in this way for at least a billion years. Eventually, however, it would have stopped working as the Moon got farther away from Earth. “The farther out the Moon moves, the slower the stirring, and at a certain point the lunar dynamo shuts off,” Dwyer said.

Rocks can become magnetized from the shock of an impact, a mechanism some scientists have proposed to explain the magnetization of lunar samples. But recent paleomagnetic analyses of Moon rocks, as well as orbital measurements of the magnetization of the lunar crust, suggest that there was a strong, long-lived magnetic field on the Moon early in its history.

“One of the nice things about our model is that it explains how a lunar dynamo could have lasted for a billion years,” Nimmo said. “It also makes predictions about how the strength of the field should have changed over the years, and that’s potentially testable with enough paleomagnetic observations.”

More detailed analysis is needed, however, to show that stirring of the core by the mantle would create the right kind of fluid motions to generate a magnetic field. “Only certain types of fluid motions give rise to magnetic dynamos,” Dwyer said. “We calculated the power that’s available to drive the dynamo and the magnetic field strengths that could be generated. But we really need the dynamo experts to take this model to the next level of detail and see if it works.”

A working model of a lunar dynamo, combined with more detailed paleomagnetic analysis of Moon rocks, could give scientists a powerful tool for investigating the history of the Moon, Dwyer said. In addition, the study presents a novel mechanism for generating a magnetic field not only on the Moon, but also on other small bodies, including large asteroids.

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
RICHARD MCCONNELL said:
Presumably the primeval moon would have been spinning quite rapidly immediately after its formation (according to the
'planetary collision' theory). The strong tidal slowing caused by interaction with the then nearby Earth would have provided plenty of stirring in the moon's still liquid core, so the existence of an early magnetic field would probably be expected.
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me