Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

One promising puzzle piece for confirming dark matter now seems unlikely fit

Theories predict that the positron signal should suddenly drop off in cosmic rays beyond a certain energy level, but researchers didn’t see the drop-off, so for now, their result is inconclusive when it comes to pointing the way to dark matter.
By Kavli Foundation, Oxnard, California Published: November 29, 2011
Fermi space telescope
The Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope detects gamma-rays by tracking the electrons and positrons they produce after striking layers of tungsten. NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center Conceptual Image Lab
In 2008, the European-Russian satellite PAMELA scanned the cosmic ray spectrum and picked up something curious — an excess of antimatter positrons. It was a startling discovery, in part, because it could have been a sign of the existence of dark matter long pursued by the worldwide physics community.

Researchers with the Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology (KIPAC) at Stanford University in Palo Alto, California, are confirming the previous detection, and the excess seems to grow at higher energies in the spectrum, which is consistent with many theories about how dark matter might produce positrons.

The KIPAC result comes with a major caveat, however, since those theories also predict that the positron signal should suddenly drop off in cosmic rays beyond a certain energy level. The KIPAC researchers didn’t see the drop-off, so for now, their result is inconclusive when it comes to pointing the way to dark matter.

Along with the findings being noteworthy, so is the way the researchers went about their work. To make their determination, the researchers relied on the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope. The challenge: the telescope is designed for detecting neutral photons, and doesn’t have a magnet for separating negatively charged electrons and positively charged positrons, which was essential for the experiment. The solution: the researchers found a magnet a few hundred miles away from the telescope that did the trick. It was Earth, which, thanks to its magnetic field, naturally bends the paths of charged particles raining more or less continuously from space.

After studying up on geophysics maps and calculating precisely how Earth was filtering out charged particles seen by the telescope, the researchers went ahead with their analysis and wound up with their dramatic results. “The big takeaway here is how valuable it is to measure and understand the world around us in as many ways as possible,” said Justin Vandenbroucke. “Once you have this basic scientific knowledge, it’s often surprising how that knowledge can be useful.”

“It was very satisfying that our approach, novel as it was, seemed to work so well,” said Stefan Funk.

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
4 stars
LARS LINDSTROM from PENNSYLVANIA said:
I just wonder: Could it be that the virtual matter constantly popping in and out of existence, especially in the presence of matter and energy fields, also creates a gravity field that, when added together in a galaxy, could be strong enough to fit the bill of the dark matter we are looking for?
5 stars
OTTO KROG SR said:
My take on dark matter is, that it is a miscalculating, stemming from our presumption that the speed of light is constant.

What if the speed of light varies through time and space?

That creates some interesting theory, at least I think so.

Antimatter is the mind and consciousness of all living entities.

You are your own universe.

Reality is where the minds (antimatter) meets the physical universe.

Interested? Then read my philosophical multiverse theory.

Google crestroyer theory and find it instantly

4 stars
BYRON GAIST said:
I'm not an astrophysicist, but reading as a layman, I wonder how accurate our calculations of the Earth's filtering of charged particles can be. Even if they are pretty accurate, do they account for any natural fluctuations which might take place? Perhaps repeating this experiment with a space telescope which has a purpose-built magnet might yield different results...I don't know, I'm just wondering!
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me