Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

Space station provides insight into flame behavior

In space, warm gases do not rise, and molecular diffusion drives flame behavior.
By NASA Headquarters, Washington, D.C. Published: November 30, 2011
Burning droplet
Color image of a burning droplet. NASA/GRC
Whether free-burning or smoldering, uncontrolled fire can threaten life and destroy property. On Earth, a little water, maybe some chemicals, and the fire is smothered.

In space, where there is no up or down, flames behave in unconventional ways. And when your entire world is the size of a five-bedroom home like the International Space Station, putting out even a small fire quickly is a life-and-death matter.

Since March 2009, NASA's Flame Extinguishment Experiment (FLEX) has conducted more than 200 tests to better understand the fundamentals of flames and how best to suppress fire in space. The investigation is currently ongoing aboard the space station.

"We hope to gain a better knowledge of droplet burning, improved spacecraft fire safety, and ideas for more efficient utilization of liquid fuels on Earth," said Forman Williams from the University of California, San Diego. "The experiments will be used to verify numerical models that calculate droplet burning under different conditions."

When a flame burns on Earth, heated gases rise from the fire, creating a buoyant flow that draws oxygen into the flame and combustion products away from it. In space, warm gases do not rise, and molecular diffusion drives flame behavior.

"In space, molecular diffusion draws oxygen to the flame and combustion products away from the flame at a rate 100 times slower than the buoyant flow on Earth," said Dan Dietrich from NASA's Glenn Research Center in Cleveland, Ohio.

Flames in space burn with a lower temperature, at a lower rate, and with less oxygen than in normal gravity. This means that materials used to extinguish the fire must be present in higher concentrations. The slow flow of air from the fans mixing the air in a spacecraft can make the flames burn even faster.

To help understand how flames behave and burn in space, FLEX researchers ignite a small drop of either heptane or methanol. As this little sphere of fuel burns for about 20 seconds, it is engulfed by a spherically symmetric flame. The droplet shrinks until either the flame extinguishes or the fuel runs out.

"Thus far, the most surprising thing we've observed is continued apparent burning of heptane droplets after flame extinction under certain conditions; currently, this is entirely unexplained," said Williams.

From ignition to extinguishment, the entire event is recorded by cameras housed in the NASA Glenn-designed-and-built Combustion Integrated Rack (CIR), which is located inside the U.S. Destiny Laboratory module of the space station.

"You have both elements being represented in the FLEX experiment — both the exploration-driven fire safety research and the more fundamental science research," Dietrich said.

As for the fundamental science of combustion, there are still many discoveries to be made, even for an experienced professor who has studied the subject since college.

Test #1 - Droplet diameter of 4 mm, with no support fiber. Droplet deployment was successful with a brief burn before radiative extinction. An afterglow from condensing vapor cloud and scattered backlight occurred approximately 30 sec after extinction. This afterglow phenomena typically occurs following radiative extinction. NASA/JSC
Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
4 stars
BILL SIMPSON from LOUISIANA said:
It keeps burning for so long because it can't get enough oxygen to burn more rapidly, since the combustion exhausted most of the oxygen in the vicinity of the flame during the initial fireball. The molecules can only diffuse so fast, with no gas movement caused by zero G. It is like if you stop breathing. (Not recommended.) Not enough oxygen molecules can be absorbed by your lung tissue from the still air, just sitting in your lungs. There is still plenty of oxygen in your lungs, but only the molecules touching the cell walls can get absorbed. Not enough oxygen molecules can touch and be absorbed, if the air isn't moving around in there.
They should use lasers (?) to analyze the space in, and around the flame, to measure the composition and distribution of the combustion gasses produced as the fuel burns. Then they could prove my theory wrong. Not about the lungs (they already did that with the water boarding), but about the rate of oxygen diffusion not being able to support the rapid initial combustion rate for long.
There is probably a lot more going on, when pressure caused by heat from the flame is considered. You need to find a very good math, chemistry, & physics person to calculate all those effects. In zero G, all those tiny forces probably affect the flame behavior quite a bit.
I would be reluctant to fool around with fire in an oxygen rich atmosphere. Your first mistake is generally your last.
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me