Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

Massive stars are born as giants

A young star in the Omega Nebula further supports the theory that a massive star contracts until it reaches a stable equilibrium at the end of its formation process.
By NOVA, Leiden Published: December 8, 2011
Massive star formation
Artist’s impression illustrating the formation process of massive stars. At the end of the formation process, the surrounding accretion disk disappears, revealing the surface of the young star. At this phase, the young massive star is much larger than when it has reached a stable equilibrium, i.e., when arriving on the so-called main sequence. Lucas Ellerbroek/Lex Kaper University of Amsterdam
Astronomers from the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands have shown that forming massive stars are much bigger than grown-up massive stars. Their observations confirm the theory that, at the conclusion of the formation process, a massive star further contracts until it has reached a stable equilibrium.

For many years, it has been a challenge to obtain a clear spectrum of a massive star still in the process of formation. The reason is that forming stars are deeply embedded inside their parental clouds that obscure their birthplaces from view. Recently, a spectrum has been obtained of the young star B275 in the Omega Nebula (M17) with the new, powerful spectrograph X-shooter on the European Southern Observatory’s Very Large Telescope in Chile. This has resulted in the first firm spectral classification of a massive star on its way to the main sequence.

The spectrum indicates that B275 is about three times as large as a normal main-sequence star, which is about seven times more massive than our Sun. This is in agreement with the predictions of current star formation models.

At an earlier phase in the formation process, a rotating gaseous disk surrounds young massive stars, feeding the forming star. This mass-accretion process is physically complicated and poorly understood, and it is often accompanied by the presence of strong jets.

When the accretion process is finished, the surrounding disk disappears and the surface of the new star becomes visible; B275 has entered this phase. The core temperature of the new star is now high enough for hydrogen fusion to commence. The star further contracts until the energy production in the core exactly compensates the radiation losses at the stellar surface and a stable equilibrium has been reached.

The X-shooter spectrum indicates that the surface temperature of the massive young star B275 is significantly lower than usual for such a luminous star — 1,600 times more luminous than the Sun, the luminosity of a 7-solar-mass star. Assigning a larger radius to the star solves this discrepancy. That is exactly what the sharp spectral lines of B275 demonstrate: the spectrum of a giant star.

“The large wavelength coverage of X-shooter provides the opportunity to determine many stellar properties at once, like the surface temperature, size, and the presence of a disk,” said Bram Ochsendorf from the University of Amsterdam.

Rolf Chini and Vera Hofmeisster from the Ruhr-Univeersitaet in Bochum, Germany, obtained the spectrum of B275 during the X-shooter science verification process. “This is a beautiful confirmation of new theoretical models describing the formation process of massive stars, obtained thanks to the extreme sensitivity of X-shooter,” said Lex Kaper from the University of Amsterdam.

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
3 stars
STEPHEN ARMSTRONG from CALIFORNIA said:
Um, it's completely accreted(?) A more relevant question to THIS article would be: You say that, "The star further contracts until the energy production in the core exactly compensates the radiation losses at the stellar surface and a stable equilibrium has been reached", but I thought that it collapsed until the outward pressure of fusion from the core equaled the pressure of the weight of the star's collapsing outer layers onto the core. How can both explanations be right?
3 stars
CHRIS R BAKER from CALIFORNIA said:
"When the accretion process is finished, the surrounding disk disappears..." Nice. I like that. It just disappears.

WHERE DOES IT DISAPPEAR TO?
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me