Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

Hubble zooms in on double nucleus in Andromeda Galaxy

The double nucleus is actually an elliptical ring of old reddish stars in orbit around a black hole but more distant than the compact central cluster of blue stars.
By STScl, Baltimore, Maryland Published: January 13, 2012
M31-nucleus
This is a Hubble image of the 100-million-solar-mass black hole at the hub of the neighboring spiral galaxy M31, the Andromeda Galaxy. The compact cluster of blue stars is surrounded by the larger “double nucleus” of M31. The double nucleus is actually an elliptical ring of old reddish stars in orbit around the black hole but more distant than the blue stars. Credit: NASA/ESA/T. Lauer (National Optical Astronomy Observatory)
A new Hubble Space Telescope image centers on the 100-million-solar-mass black hole at the hub of the neighboring spiral galaxy M31, the Andromeda Galaxy, one of the few galaxies outside the Milky Way visible to the naked eye and the only other giant galaxy in the Local Group.

This is the sharpest visible-light image ever made of the nucleus of an external galaxy.

The event horizon, the closest region around the black hole where light can still escape, is too small to be seen, but it lies near the middle of a compact cluster of blue stars at the center of the image. The compact cluster of blue stars is surrounded by the larger “double nucleus” of M31, discovered with the Hubble Space Telescope in 1992. The double nucleus is actually an elliptical ring of old reddish stars in orbit around the black hole but more distant than the blue stars. When the stars are at the farthest point in their orbit, they move slower and give the illusion of a second nucleus.

The blue stars surrounding the black hole are no more than 200 million years old, and therefore must have formed near the black hole in an abrupt burst of star formation. Massive blue stars are so short-lived that they would not have enough time to migrate to the black hole if they were formed elsewhere.

Astronomers are trying to understand how apparently young stars were formed so deep inside the black hole’s gravitational grip and how they survive in an extreme environment.

The fact that young stars are also closely bound to the central black hole in our Milky Way Galaxy suggests this may be a common phenomenon in spiral galaxies.

Tod R. Lauer from the National Optical Astronomy Observatory in Tucson, Arizona, assembled this image of the nuclear region by taking several blue and ultraviolet-light exposures of the nucleus with Hubble’s Advanced Camera for Surveys’ high-resolution channel during September 2005 and February 2006, each time slightly moving the telescope to change how the camera sampled the region. By combining these pictures, he was able to construct an ultra-sharp view of the galaxy’s core.

The image of the Andromeda Galaxy was taken January 13, 2001, with the WIYN/KPNO 0.9-meter Mosaic I by T. Rector and B. Wolpa from the National Optical Astronomy Observatory in Tucson, Arizona.

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
SAM NAUMAN from TEXAS said:
I do not see why they are called "black holes". There are no holes there, just compressed matter with gravity so high that it bends the light and stops it from leaving. If I were to coin a name for the black holes, I would call them "auto eclipsing stars"
HENRY NEESER from MASSACHUSETTS said:
Beautiful photograph. As much as I have read about black hole theory, it is just that, theory. The Black Hole theory has not been proven to be a fact, and dozens of Astrophysicists can't agree on any of it. It makes for some interesting reading, however theory does not make fact. None of the Astrophysicists can agree on what the mathematical definition of a Black Hole is, they seem to be constantly trying to disprove each theory, which I find intriguing. I just can't accept the Black Hole Theory as fact until there is some supporting physical evidence.
4 stars
FREDERICK MARTELLO from NEW JERSEY said:
When a Galaxy like Andromada absorbs a smaller Galaxy, what happens to the smaller Glaxay's black hole? Does it migrate toward the supermassive black hole that was already there, perhaps producing the "double Nucleus" effect, prior to merging?
ELAINE HALL from COLORADO said:
What a beautiful photograph. I am so pleased that Hubble is an integral part of photographing deep space. Wow!
SATYABRATA NAYAK said:
hey gr8......
amazing universe always gives us surprises i m just dying to have only one glance with my eyes........those giant structure by going nearer ......... how exitinggg.
THOMAS SANTISTEVAN from CALIFORNIA said:
Is it possible the intense gravity well at the center, just like in the outer spiral arms, causes tidal forces for matter to coalesce and form into stellar material. This could explain the formation of so many new stars around the blackhole. Or maybe they could have also been pulled in from stellar nurseries in the nearest spiral arms orbiting around the black hole. Any thoughts on whether these are plausible explanations?
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me