Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

Globular star clusters survive 13-billion-year-old massacre

During galaxy collisions, smaller star clusters were destroyed by rapidly changing gravitational forces; only larger clusters survived.
By Max Planck Institute, Garching, Germany Published: February 14, 2012
Two colliding galaxies
Two colliding galaxies based on the new simulation, covering 3.3 billion years. The galaxies eventually merge, destroying many of the stellar clusters (visible here as dots) in the process. Credit: D. Kruijssen, MPA
Our Milky Way Galaxy is surrounded by about 200 compact groups of stars, containing up to a million stars each. At 13 billion years of age, these globular clusters are almost as old as the universe itself and were born when the first generations of stars and galaxies formed.

Now a team of astronomers from Germany and the Netherlands has conducted a novel type of computer simulation that looked at how they were born. They find that these giant clusters of stars are the only survivors of a 13-billion-year-old massacre that destroyed many of their smaller siblings.

Globular clusters have a remarkable characteristic — the typical number of stars they contain appears to be about the same throughout the universe. This is in contrast to much younger star clusters, which can contain almost any number of suns, from fewer than 100 to many thousands. The team of scientists proposes that this difference can be explained by the conditions under which globular clusters formed early in the evolution of their host galaxies.

The researchers ran simulations of isolated and colliding galaxies in which they included a model for the formation and destruction of star clusters. When galaxies collide, they often generate spectacular bursts of star formation (starbursts) and a wealth of bright young star clusters of many different sizes. As a result, it was always thought that the total number of star clusters increases during starbursts. But the Dutch-German team found the opposite result in their simulations.

While the brightest and largest clusters were indeed capable of surviving the galaxy collision due to their own gravitational attraction, the numerous smaller clusters were effectively destroyed by the rapidly changing gravitational forces that typically occur during starbursts due to the movement of gas, dust, and stars. The wave of starbursts came to an end after about 2 billion years, and the researchers were surprised to see that only clusters with high numbers of stars had survived. These clusters had all the characteristics that should be expected for a young population of globular clusters as they would have looked about 11 billion years ago.

“It is ironic to see that starbursts may produce many young stellar clusters, but at the same time also destroy the majority of them,” said Diederik Kruijssen from the Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics in Garching, Germany. “This occurs not only in galaxy collisions, but also should be expected in any starburst environment. In the early universe, starbursts were commonplace; therefore, it makes perfect sense that all globular clusters have approximately the same large number of stars. Their smaller brothers and sisters that didn’t contain as many stars were doomed to be destroyed.”

According to the simulations, most of the star clusters were destroyed shortly after their formation when the galactic environment was still hostile to the young clusters. After this episode ended, the surviving globular clusters have lived quietly until the present day.

The researchers have further suggestions to test their ideas. “In the nearby universe, there are several examples of galaxies that have recently undergone large bursts of star formation,” said Kruijssen. “It should therefore be possible to see the rapid destruction of small stellar clusters in action. If this is, indeed, found by new observations, it will confirm our theory for the origin of globular clusters.”

The simulations suggest that most of a globular cluster’s traits were established when it formed. The fact that globular clusters are comparable everywhere then indicates that the environments in which they formed were very similar, regardless of the galaxy they currently reside in. In that case, Kruijssen believes, they can be used as fossils to shed more light on the conditions in which the first stars and galaxies were born.

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
5 stars
JOHN C KREMER from COLORADO said:
Ancient globular clusters are indeed intriguing. Their devlopment seems to indicate a common beginning. Such development to me indicates a source of gravity to hold them together, such as mid size blackholes with a thousand to several thousands of sun mass. The larger mid size blackhole clusters would tend to survive the galaxy collisions better than clusters with a hundred or so sun mass blackhole's, assuming that blackhole's are necessary for a globular cluster to develop. How now do these mid size blackholes form or where do they come from?
4 stars
LAURENCE W HUNT from OREGON said:
Where are these 11 billion year old globular clusters located in relation to the colliding galaxies? Are the clusters above or below the planes of the galaxies? Are they near the cores or much futher out? Do the clusters remain stationary or oscillate above and below the planes? So many questions, so much more science to do. Fascinating!
JOHN MOES from MICHIGAN said:
If the global star clusters were all already formed 13 billion years ago, then at that point in time the space between them had expanded very little. If two clusters are 13 billion light years apart now, were they not only about one billion light years apart then? If space expanded uniformly wouldn't they all have been about the same size? Wouldn't small clusters between them have been torn apart? If two clusters have collided since, would that not suggest that space has not been expanding uniformly?
5 stars
ENRIQUE ROYON said:
sorprendente trabajo
5 stars
BILL SIMPSON from LOUISIANA said:
Brilliant work. You couldn't build enough new giant telescopes to test all this stuff. With the latest adaptive optics, less than giant ones can do a lot of valuable work, if they can keep the vapor lights at bay. The latest generation are almost as bright as an electric arc. They would give me a sunburn when arc welding wearing a short sleeve shirt. That is when you see the real power of electricity. When it starts to melt a steel plate in half a second. You can pass out wearing a long sleeve shirt during a humid Louisiana summer. Evaporation does not occur to cause cooling.
NASA is looking at a space base at the Lagrange point on the far side of the Moon. All they need is money.
The new engine test stand at the Stennis Space Center is coming along well. You can see pictures of it at the NASA Stennis web site. The steel companies must have loved that project! I'd hate to have to paint that sucker. You would need a team with several of the high pressure airless spray guns, or the top would be rusting by the time you reached the bottom. That Center uses a thousand gallons of well water a minute from 2 wells. A third one isn't used. Cooling the test stands and noise suppression heats the well water to 115 degrees. They let it cool before discharging it into the canal system.
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me