Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

Solar system ice: source of Earth's water

Scientific findings contradict prevailing theories about the relationship between comets and water-bearing carbonaceous chondrites and suggest that meteorites, and their parent asteroids, are the most likely sources of Earth's water.
By Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, D.C. Published: July 13, 2012
Catastrophic-asteroid
Artist's concept of a catastrophic asteroid impact with early Earth. An impact with a 300-mile-diameter (500km) asteroid would effectively sterilize the planet. The Earth may have experienced such gigantic impacts in its youth, but fortunately today there are no projectiles this large to threaten our planet. Credit: Don Davis, NASA
Scientists have long believed that comets and a type of primitive meteorite called carbonaceous chondrites were the sources of early Earth's volatile elements — which include hydrogen, nitrogen, and carbon — and possibly organic material, too. Understanding where these volatiles came from is crucial for determining the origins of both water and life on the planet. New research led by the Carnegie Institution for Science’s Conel Alexander focuses on frozen water that was distributed throughout much of the early solar system, but probably not in the materials that aggregated initially to form Earth.

The evidence for this ice is now preserved in objects like comets and water-bearing carbonaceous chondrites. The team’s findings contradict prevailing theories about the relationship between these two types of bodies and suggest that meteorites, and their parent asteroids, are the most likely sources of Earth's water.

Looking at the ratio of hydrogen to its heavy isotope deuterium in frozen water, scientists can get an idea of the relative distance from the Sun at which objects containing the water were formed. Objects that formed farther out should generally have higher deuterium content in their ice than objects that formed closer to the Sun, and objects that formed in the same regions should have similar hydrogen isotopic compositions. Therefore, by comparing the deuterium content of water in carbonaceous chondrites to the deuterium content of comets, it is possible to tell if they formed in similar reaches of the solar system.

It has been suggested that both comets and carbonaceous chondrites formed beyond the orbit of Jupiter, perhaps even at the edges of our solar system, and then moved inward, eventually bringing their bounty of volatiles and organic material to Earth. If this were true, then the ice found in comets and the remnants of ice preserved in carbonaceous chondrites in the form of hydrated silicates, such as clays, would have similar isotopic compositions.

Alexander’s team analyzed samples from 85 carbonaceous chondrites and were able to show that carbonaceous chondrites likely did not form in the same regions of the solar system as comets because they have much lower deuterium content. If so, this result directly contradicts the two most prominent models for how the solar system developed its current architecture.
The team suggests that carbonaceous chondrites formed instead in the asteroid belt that exists between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter. What's more, they propose that most of the volatile elements on Earth arrived from a variety of chondrites, not from comets.
"Our results provide important new constraints for the origin of volatiles in the inner solar system, including Earth," Alexander said. "And they have important implications for the current models of the formation and orbital evolution of the planets and smaller objects in our solar system."

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
4 stars
BILL SIMPSON from LOUISIANA said:
I wonder how much water was just floating around as water molecules, when the planets were first forming and got captured by the Earth's gravity. Most water got gradually burned off from Mars due to the lack of a strong protective magnetic field. Mercury might be too small to attract much, or have been like Mars. Venus puzzles me. How much is in that thick atmosphere? Probably a LOT of water as vapor, since it is too hot for the liquid form. Earth might have been at close to the ideal distance from the Sun to pull in a lot of vapor? Comets are so far out there, the fact that they don't appear to be the origin isn't too surprising. And the nearby asteroid belt contains millions of asteroids. Some star may have wandered by and disturbed their orbits, so that many hit Earth. I doubt we will ever know, but it shows the importance of chemistry. Maybe samples from the Moon and Mars will eventually yield an answer.
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me