Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

Do missing Jupiters mean massive comet belts?

In a new Herschel study, two nearby planetary systems have been found to host vast amounts of cometary debris.
By ESA, Noordwijk, Netherlands Published: November 28, 2012
Debris-disk
Artist impression of the debris disk and planets around the star known as Gliese 581, superimposed on Herschel PACS images at 70, 100, and 160 micrometer wavelengths. The line drawing superimposed on the Herschel image gives a schematic representation of the location and orientation of the star, planets, and disk, albeit not to scale. The black oval outline sketched onto the Herschel data represents the innermost boundary of the debris disk; the approximate location of the outermost boundary is represented by the outer set of dashed lines. It is not possible to identify the central star due to smearing of the Herschel data. // Credit: ESA/AOES
Using the European Space Agency’s (ESA) Herschel Space Observatory, astronomers have discovered vast comet belts surrounding two nearby planetary systems known to host only Earth-to-Neptune-mass worlds. The comet reservoirs could have delivered life-giving oceans to the innermost planets.

In a previous Herschel study, scientists found that the dusty belt surrounding nearby star Fomalhaut must be maintained by collisions between comets.

In the new Herschel study, two more nearby planetary systems — GJ 581 and 61 Vir — have been found to host vast amounts of cometary debris.

Herschel detected the signatures of cold dust at –392° Fahrenheit (–200° Celsius), in quantities that mean these systems must have at least 10 times more comets than in our solar system’s Kuiper Belt.

GJ 581, or Gliese 581, is a low-mass M dwarf star, the most common type of star in the galaxy. Earlier studies have shown that it hosts at least four planets, including one that resides in the “Goldilocks Zone” — the distance from the central sun where liquid surface water could exist.

Two planets are confirmed around G-type star 61 Vir, which is just a little less massive than our Sun.

The planets in both systems are known as “super-Earths,” covering a range of masses between two and 18 times that of Earth.

Interestingly, however, there is no evidence for giant Jupiter- or Saturn-mass planets in either system.

The gravitational interplay between Jupiter and Saturn in our solar system is thought to have been responsible for disrupting a once highly populated Kuiper Belt, sending a deluge of comets toward the inner planets in a cataclysmic event that lasted several million years.

“The new observations are giving us a clue: They’re saying that in the solar system we have giant planets and a relatively sparse Kuiper Belt, but systems with only low-mass planets often have much denser Kuiper belts,” said Mark Wyatt from the University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.

“We think that may be because the absence of a Jupiter in the low-mass planet systems allows them to avoid a dramatic heavy bombardment event and instead experience a gradual rain of comets over billions of years.”

“For an older star like GJ 581, which is at least 2 billion years old, enough time has elapsed for such a gradual rain of comets to deliver a sizable amount of water to the innermost planets, which is of particular importance for the planet residing in the star’s habitable zone,” said Jean-Francois Lestrade of Paris Observatory.

However, in order to produce the vast amount of dust seen by Herschel, collisions between the comets are needed, which could be triggered by a Neptune-sized planet residing close to the disk.

“Simulations show us that the known close-in planets in each of these systems cannot do the job, but a similarly-sized planet located much further from the star — currently beyond the reach of current detection campaigns — would be able to stir the disk to make it dusty and observable,” said Lestrade.

“Herschel is finding a correlation between the presence of massive debris disks and planetary systems with no Jupiter-class planets, which offers a clue to our understanding of how planetary systems form and evolve,” said Göran Pilbratt from ESA.

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
5 stars
RICHARD MCCONNELL from UNITED KINGDOM said:
It goes to show what a well-ordered system we live in, with large planets to sweep away unwanted debris like comets, after conveniently supplying us with cometary water at an earlier period.
Of course if it wasn't a well-ordered system we wouldn't be here to see it!
5 stars
BILL SIMPSON from LOUISIANA said:
If our solar system has billions of comets out there in the Oort cloud, most solar systems probably also have them. I just hope none hit us again anytime soon. That would be bad.
We should develop a nuclear powered spacecraft to go out and deflect any that could impact Earth. Visit the 'Impact Earth!' website to see why. A 'little' comet can do unimaginable damage. The fact that it is mostly ice makes little difference, if it hits at 100,000 miles an hour.
5 stars
RON CHINCHEN from AUSTRALIA (NSW) said:
I may be speaking out of line here but how can they tell if there are no Jupiter sized planets revolving around lots of stars including those identified in this article, revolving out at Jupiter or Saturn distances from their primary star.

The only apparent means of determining the existence of such planets is by way of either the eclipsing method being used by Kepler or the wobble effect caused by gravitational symbiosis between the star and planet.

Both methods have only in the past decade for the latter and the last few years for the former, been able to detect any planets at all. And both rely on watching the effect on the primary star of the orbit of companion Jupiters to determine either the very small gravitational effect on the star or the once an orbit eclipse. And that's if the plane of those planetary systems are precisely lined up with the line of sight from Earth, a small minority of the stars in the sky.

And given Jupiter takes over 5 years and Saturn takes almost 10 years just for one orbit, it is likely that Kepler would so far have seen only a minority of those planets through an eclipse and it would have taken the wobble effect at least 5-10 years just to determine the wobble effect of one orbit.

Seems to me we are expecting far too much too early.
DENNIS BLANCHARD from CALIFORNIA said:
To glean real sense out of computer simulations more observations like this of both low-mass and higher mass stars are needed to tease out possible migration scenarios for Jupiter-class planets and how they affect the evolution of solar systems.
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me