Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

Swinburne team on Keck discovers farthest supernova ever

The discovery offers the rare possibility of observing the explosions of the first stars to form after the Big Bang.
By W. M. Keck Observatory, Kamuela, Hawaii Published: November 2, 2012
Supernovae_illustration
High-resolution simulation of a galaxy hosting a superluminous supernova and its chaotic environment in the early universe. // Credit: Adrian Malec and Marie Martig (Swinburne Univ.)
Two superluminous supernovae — stellar explosions 10–100 times brighter than other supernova types — have been detected in the distant universe, using the W. M. Keck Observatory atop Mauna Kea, Hawaii. The discovery sets a record for the most distant supernova yet detected, and it offers the rare possibility of observing the explosions of the first stars to form after the Big Bang.

“The type of supernovae we’ve found are extremely rare,” said Jeff Cooke from Swinburne University of Technology in Melbourne, Australia, whose team made the discovery. “In fact, only one has been discovered prior to our work. This particular type of supernova results from the death of a very massive star — about 100 to 250 times the mass of our Sun — and explodes in a completely different way compared to other supernovae. Discovering and studying these events provide us with observational examples to better understand them and the chemicals they eject into the universe when they die.”

Superluminous supernovae were discovered only a few years ago and are rare in the nearby universe. Their origins are not well understood, but a small subset of them is thought to occur when extremely massive stars undergo a nuclear explosion triggered by the conversion of photons into electron-positron pairs. Such events are expected to have occurred more frequently in the early universe, at high redshift, when massive stars were more common. This, and the extreme brightness of these events, encouraged Cooke and colleagues to search for superluminous supernovae at redshifts greater than 2, when the universe was less than one-quarter of its present age.

“We used Low Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (LRIS) on Keck I to get the deep spectroscopy to confirm the host redshifts and to search for late-time emission from the supernovae,” Cooke said. “The initial detections were found in the CFHT Legacy Survey Deep fields. The light from the supernovae arrived here on Earth four to six years ago. To confirm their distances, we need to get a spectrum of their host galaxies, which are very faint because of their extreme distance. The large aperture of Keck and the high sensitivity of LRIS made this possible. In addition, some supernovae have bright enough emission features that persist for years after they explode. The deep Keck spectroscopy is able to detect these lines as a further means of confirmation and study.”

Cooke and co-workers searched through a large volume of the universe at redshift greater than or equal to 2, and found two superluminous supernovae at redshifts of 2.05 and 3.90 — breaking the previous supernova redshift record of 2.36 and implying a production rate of superluminous supernovae at these redshifts at least 10 times higher than in the nearby universe. Although the spectra of these two objects make it unlikely that their progenitors were among the first generation of stars, the present results suggest that detection of those stars may not be far from our grasp.

Detecting the first stars allows us much greater understanding of the first stars in the universe, Cooke said. “Shortly after the Big Bang, there was only hydrogen and helium in the universe. All the other elements that we see around us today, such as carbon, oxygen, iron, and silicon, were manufactured in the cores of stars or during supernova explosions. The first stars to form after the Big Bang laid the framework for the long process of enriching the universe that eventually produced the diverse set of galaxies, stars, and planets we see around us today. Our discoveries probe an early time in the universe that overlaps with the time we expect to see the first stars.”

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
EDDIE CHUAH SR from NEW ZEALAND said:
Yes, i always enjoy the weekly email. please keep sending. Thanked
5 stars
ROBERT A MORSTADT from UTAH said:
Yes, I agree. There was an article in Scientific American within the past year about pair-instability supernova. The photon density in a solar core is incredible high. It takes a 1,000 years for photons to get out of the core of our own sun. The physicists are saying that there calculations show that there can be so many photons that suddenly they found matter, the electron and the anti-electron in such huge numbers that the pressure from the extinction of light drops dramatically and the core collapses. A new set of thermonuclear reactions is triggered and a super super nova results. I find it incredible that the electron and anti-electron don't immediately find each other and recombine to generate the photon, especially considering that the two attract each other (opposite charge). The physicists know this fact, too, and evidently there calculations are saying that in an instant all of this can happen.
4 stars
CHRISTOPHER GRAHAM from TEXAS said:
Since starting to learn about astromony, I have wondered how the Big Bang and light year traveled stuff works. I do not really know how to ask this question that is in my head, but here it goes. If the Universe was created 14.5 Billion years ago, and everything was closer together and then it expanded I do not understand this red shift stuff. The universe doesn't expand at the speed of light, so the light of these far away stars has always been reaching us from the beginning. It didn't really take it, for example, 10 million years to reach us Or, are we really looking into the past if the light has always been hitting us? It really takes some thought to wrap your head around this concept. Are we really looking into the past or are we just seeing our reality?
DR ROBERT L PICCIONI from CALIFORNIA said:
Roger Moore Jr. asks a great question. In fact, every interact in nature involves some conversion of matter into energy or energy into matter. For most interactions we see, which are driven by the electric force, less than 1 part per billion is converted. In nuclear reactions 1% or less is converted. But at very high energies the conversion can be 100%. Physicists routinely convert energy into matter (that's how we make new particles like the Higgs boson). At high enough energies, nature very generously produces everything that exists, even particles we never before imagined. I teach Einstein's theories and cosmology at UCLA. Please feel free to contact me directly at www.guidetothecosmos.com.
JEREMY GOODHOPE LEVINE said:
Roger Moore Jr, I believe that the article may be referring to what are called Pair-Instability Supernovae which only occur in the most massive of stars (as indicated in the article). You can find more information here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pair-instability_supernova
5 stars
ROGER MOORE JR from MISSOURI said:
Okay, I have a question. I am no physicist, astronomer nor cosmologist by any stretch of the imagination but have an unquenchable interest of the mysteries and possibilities of the aforementioned and read as much as I can absorb. The article stated, "a nuclear explosion triggered by the conversion of photons into electron-positron pairs." This sounds to me like a natural occurence of energy changing into matter (although the matter is paired with its' anti-matter counter-part therefore creating an annihilation situation). But energy into matter? A feat we are, as of yet, incapable of doing but is the article saying it happened naturally?
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me