Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

Future evidence for extraterrestrial life might come from dying stars

Researchers found that we could detect oxygen in the atmosphere of a white dwarf’s planet much more easily than for an Earth-like planet orbiting a Sun-like star.
By Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, Massachusetts Published: February 26, 2013
Habitable-planet - artist
A new study finds that we could detect oxygen in the atmosphere of a habitable planet orbiting a white dwarf (as shown in this artist's illustration) much more easily than for an Earth-like planet orbiting a Sun-like star. Here the ghostly blue ring is a planetary nebula — hydrogen gas the star ejected as it evolved from a red giant to a white dwarf. // David A. Aguilar (CfA)
Even dying stars could host planets with life, and if such life exists, we might be able to detect it within the next decade. This encouraging result comes from a new theoretical study of Earth-like planets orbiting white dwarf stars. Researchers found that we could detect oxygen in the atmosphere of a white dwarf’s planet much more easily than for an Earth-like planet orbiting a Sun-like star.

“In the quest for extraterrestrial biological signatures, the first stars we study should be white dwarfs,” said Avi Loeb from the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge.

When a star like the Sun dies, it puffs off its outer layers, leaving behind a hot core called a white dwarf. A typical white dwarf is about the size of Earth. It slowly cools and fades over time, but it can retain heat long enough to warm a nearby world for billions of years.

Since a white dwarf is much smaller and fainter than the Sun, a planet would have to be much closer in to be habitable with liquid water on its surface. A habitable planet would circle the white dwarf once every 10 hours at a distance of about a million miles.

Before a star becomes a white dwarf, it swells into a red giant, engulfing and destroying any nearby planets. Therefore, a planet would have to arrive in the habitable zone after the star evolved into a white dwarf. A planet could form from leftover dust and gas — making it a second-generation world — or migrate inward from a larger distance.

If planets exist in the habitable zones of white dwarfs, astronomers would need to find them before they could study them. The abundance of heavy elements on the surface of white dwarfs suggests that a significant fraction of them have rocky planets. Loeb and his colleague Dan Maoz from Tel Aviv University in Israel estimate that a survey of the 500 closest white dwarfs could spot one or more habitable Earths.

The best method for finding such planets is a transit search, looking for a star that dims as an orbiting planet crosses in front of it. Since a white dwarf is about the same size as Earth, an Earth-sized planet would block a large fraction of its light and create an obvious signal.

More importantly, scientists can only study the atmospheres of transiting planets. When the white dwarf’s light shines through the ring of air that surrounds the planet’s silhouetted disk, the atmosphere absorbs some starlight. This leaves chemical fingerprints showing whether that air contains water vapor or even signatures of life, such as oxygen.

Astronomers are particularly interested in finding oxygen because the oxygen in Earth’s atmosphere is continuously replenished through photosynthesis by plant life. Were all life to cease on Earth, our atmosphere would quickly become devoid of oxygen, which would dissolve in the oceans and oxidize the surface. Thus, the presence of large quantities of oxygen in the atmosphere of a distant planet would signal the likely presence of life there.

NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), scheduled for launch by the end of this decade, promises to sniff out the gases of these alien worlds. Loeb and Maoz created a synthetic spectrum, replicating what JWST would see if it examined a habitable planet orbiting a white dwarf. They found that both oxygen and water vapor would be detectable with only a few hours of total observation time.

“JWST offers the best hope of finding an inhabited planet in the near future,” said Maoz.

Recent research by Courtney Dressing and David Charbonneau from the Center for Astrophysics showed that the closest habitable planet is likely to orbit a red dwarf star — a cool, low-mass star undergoing nuclear fusion. Since a red dwarf, although smaller and fainter than the Sun, is much larger and brighter than a white dwarf, its glare would overwhelm the faint signal from an orbiting planet’s atmosphere. JWST would have to observe hundreds of hours of transits to have any hope of analyzing the atmosphere’s composition.

“Although the closest habitable planet might orbit a red dwarf star, the closest one we can easily prove to be life-bearing might orbit a white dwarf,” said Loeb.

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
CODY BRUSO from COLORADO said:
It is difficult to accept that any event or chain reaction only occurs once in the Universe, including complex or simple life. An exception being the white hole at the"birth" of everything. There is such a staggering amount of opportunities out there for life to take hold. However complex the ingredients and combinations are for life to exist, the chance that this anomaly of life has only appeared a single time seems even more vast than the Universe itself.
I'd also like to point out that the Universe itself is alive and/or "self-aware" :) Human life is composed of the universe, we observe and learn about ourselves internally as well as externally. We are living proof, at least in general, that the Universe is self-aware on some level. The same can be said about our beautiful planet.
In addition, we know we are pieces of light accumulated from exploded stars. We are aware of light, matter, space,dark energy and dark matter..... We have learned that only a fraction, what is it ten to twenty percent, of the Universe is visible and material. So it seems possible that 85% of a human is not visible or in a material form. It may also be possible that 85% of life in the Universe is in a form that isn't visible or material.
We need instruments to measure and understand this unseen side of it all. Maybe the best tool to use is within us, the part of us that is not visible or material. The problem is sharing the evidence with others who may not exercise that part of themselves, because the evidence itself may not be material and visible.
Thank you for reading and good journey. e-mail me if you want-cody.bruso@yahoo.com
3 stars
IAN KAYE from UNITED KINGDOM said:
Very interesting article on possible life on planets orbiting white dwarf stars although it seems an unlikely theory.
"A planet could form from leftover dust and gas (making it a second-generation world), or migrate inward from a larger distance."
My comment would be that there is (as yet) little evidence of 2nd-generation planets existing. There is a few observed candidate 2nd generation systems including PSR B1620-26 (in a globular cluster), Gl 86, HD 27442 and all of the currently observed circumbinary planet candidates. But that's all they are; candidates.
Secondly, why would outer planets within this star system "migrate inward from a larger distance"? Surely the white dwarf is very small and has less gravitational pull. If anything, it seems these outer planets would migrate outwards.
BABU RANGANATHAN from PENNSYLVANIA said:
HAVING THE RIGHT CONDITIONS TO SUSTAIN LIFE doesn't mean that life can originate by chance or from non-living matter. Please read my popular Internet articles listed below:

SCIENCE AND THE ORIGIN OF LIFE, NATURAL LIMITS OF EVOLUTION, HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS (2nd Edition), DOES GOD PARTICLE EXPLAIN UNIVERSE'S ORIGIN? NO HALF-EVOLVED DINOSAURS

Visit my newest Internet site: THE SCIENCE SUPPORTING CREATION

Sincerely,
Babu G. Ranganathan*
(B.A. theology/biology)

Author of popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS

* I have had the privilege of being recognized in the 24th edition of Marquis "Who's Who In The East" for my writings on religion and science, and I have given successful lectures (with question and answer time afterwards) defending creation from science before evolutionist science faculty and students at various colleges and universities.
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me