Tonight's Sky
Sun
Sun
Moon
Moon
Mercury
Mercury
Venus
Venus
Mars
Mars
Jupiter
Jupiter
Saturn
Saturn

Tonight's Sky — Change location

OR

Searching...

Tonight's Sky — Select location

Tonight's Sky — Enter coordinates

° '
° '

I have heard that exoplanet Kepler-1625b might have an exomoon. Is it possible for two planets to be in a binary system around a single star?

Robert Byerly 
Windsor, California
AskAstroPlanetorMoon
Two moons orbit a gas giant in a distant star system. Determining whether a pair is a binary planet or a planet and moon is difficult, given our current astronomical definitions. If Kepler-1625b has a companion, it is much larger than either exomoon pictured here.
NASA/JPL-Caltech
This is a question that comes up again and again, but as it turns out, there isn’t a clear definition for binary planet, at least as far as the International Astronomical Union is concerned. 

Take Pluto and Charon. Is Charon a moon, or do Pluto and Charon constitute a binary? What about Earth and our Moon? In both cases the mass of the moon is exceptionally large compared to the mass of the planet. And if the difference between the two masses is small enough, the center of gravity can lie outside the planet, in the space between the planet and the moon, and the two objects both actually orbit this point in space. Such is the case for Pluto and Charon, so you might call it a binary. But many of us continue to call Charon a moon. The dividing line is quite blurry, and evidently a matter of preference.

What is clear, though, is that Charon and our Moon must have formed differently from the moons around, say, Jupiter, which are thought to have formed in a disk of material swirling around the planet in the early days of the solar system. By contrast, both Charon and our Moon are thought to have resulted from catastrophic collisions in the deep past.

The exomoon candidate we identified, if it exists, is also much too large to have formed in a disk of material around Kepler-1625b. If we’re correct, it’s about the size of Neptune. That’s something hardly anyone has anticipated and is reason enough to be agnostic about the moon’s existence until we’ve confirmed it with our recent Hubble observations. We tend to think theorists shouldn’t worry too much about how it formed until we know it’s real, but recent work has suggested that a system like Kepler-1625b could be formed through gravitational capture, more akin to the way Neptune acquired its large moon Triton.

The universe is really good at surprising us, and sometimes the most exciting observations are the ones that aren’t easily explained. If the moon around Kepler-1625b turns out to be real, it should be a nice puzzle for the theorists. But we’ve got to confirm it first, so stay tuned.

Alex Teachey 
NSF Graduate Research Fellow, 
Department of Astronomy, 
Columbia University, New York

0

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

Read and share your comments on this article
Comment on this article
Want to leave a comment?
Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Login or Register now.
0 comments
ADVERTISEMENT

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Receive news, sky-event information, observing tips, and more from Astronomy's weekly email newsletter. View our Privacy Policy.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
asy_LifeOnMars_rightrail

Click here to receive a FREE e-Guide exclusively from Astronomy magazine.

Find us on Facebook