The team found that the dusty planet circles its parent star every 15 hours — one of the shortest planet orbits ever observed. Such a short orbit must be tight and implies that the planet must be heated by its orange-hot parent star to a temperature of about 3600° Fahrenheit (2000° Celsius). Researchers hypothesize that rocky material at the surface of the planet melts and evaporates at such high temperatures, forming a wind that carries both gas and dust into space. Dense clouds of the dust trail the planet as it speeds around its star.
“We think this dust is made up of submicron-sized particles,” said Saul Rappaport from MIT in Cambridge, Massachusetts. “It would be like looking through a Los Angeles smog.”
The group’s findings are based on data from the Kepler Observatory, a space-based telescope that surveys more than 160,000 stars in the Milky Way. The observatory records the brightness of each star at regular intervals; scientists then analyze the data for signs of new planets outside our solar system.
A curiously stellar case
Astronomers using the Kepler satellite typically identify exoplanets by looking for regular dips in a star’s brightness. For example, if a star dims every month, one possibility is that the dimming is due to a planet that travels around the star over the course of a month; each time the planet travels in front of the star, the planet blocks the same small amount of light.
However, Rappaport and his colleagues came across a curious light pattern from a star dubbed KIC 12557548. The group examined the star’s light curve, a graph of its brightness over time, and found that its light dropped by different intensities every 15 hours — suggesting that something was blocking the star regularly, but by varying degrees.
The team considered several explanations for the puzzling data, including the possibility that a planetary duo — two planets orbiting each other — also orbited the star. (Rappaport reasoned that the planetary pair would pass by the star at different orientations, blocking out different amounts of light during each eclipse.) In the end, the data failed to support this hypothesis: The dimming every 15 hours was judged far too short a period to allow sufficient room for two planetary bodies orbiting each other in the same way that Earth and the Moon together orbit the Sun.
A dusty idea
Instead, the researchers landed on a novel hypothesis: that the varying intensities of light were caused by a somewhat amorphous, shape-shifting body.
“I’m not sure how we came to this epiphany,” Rappaport said. “But it had to be something that was fundamentally changing. It was not a solid body, but rather dust coming off the planet.”
Rappaport and his colleagues investigated various ways in which dust could be created and blown off a planet. They reasoned that the planet must have a low gravitational field, much like that of Mercury, in order for gas and dust to escape from the planet’s gravitational pull. The planet must also be extremely hot — on the order of 3600°F (2000°C).
Rappaport said there are two possible explanations for how the planetary dust might form: It might erupt as ash from surface volcanoes, or it could form from metals that are vaporized by high temperatures and then condensed into dust. As for how much dust is spewed from the planet, the team showed that the world could lose enough dust to explain the Kepler data. From their calculations, the researchers concluded that at such a rate the planet would completely disintegrate within 100 million years.
The researchers created a model of the planet orbiting its star, along with its long, trailing cloud of dust. The dust was densest immediately surrounding the planet, thinning out as it trailed away. The group simulated the star’s brightness as the planet and its dust cloud passed by, and found that the light patterns matched the irregular light curve taken from the Kepler Observatory.
“We’re actually now very happy about the asymmetry in the eclipse profile,” Rappaport said. “At first, we didn’t understand this picture. But once we developed this theory, we realized this dust tail has to be here. If it’s not, this picture is wrong.”
Dan Fabrycky, a member of the Kepler Observatory science team, said the model may add to the many different ways in which a planet can disappear.
“This might be another way in which planets are eventually doomed,” said Fabrycky, who was not involved in the research. “A lot of research has come to the conclusion that planets are not eternal objects. They can die extraordinary deaths, and this might be a case where the planet might evaporate entirely in the future.”
