Day vs. dawn and dusk
Like I said, this was not a planned observation but a whimsical one that turned into something fascinating. The sky was exceedingly clear (free of haze), which helped with the sighting, as did the altitude of Maun, Botswana, which is at 3,041 feet (927 meters) above sea level. But can there be better sighting conditions for the lunar crescent?
For twilight observations, your chances of seeing a thin lunar crescent are best when the Moon is at perigee (closest to Earth) and near its greatest ecliptic latitude, which is about plus or minus 5.5°. For my November 16 sighting, the Moon stood (serendipitously) 4.8° north of the ecliptic. But it wasn’t at perigee; it was five days from apogee (farthest from Earth). Now I wonder, for daytime observations, is looking near apogee more beneficial than at perigee because the Moon appears smaller and its light more condensed? It’s worth investigating.
Something else that needs investigating is how the Moon’s altitude affects the observation. Looking for a thin daytime crescent may be better when the Sun is hugging the horizon, but such a time may also hinder observations because we are looking through a denser atmosphere with more haze and airborne pollutants, which would diminish the view. My observation occurred when the Moon was relatively low, only about one-fifth the way from the horizon to the zenith. Would it be easier to see when highest in the sky?
As with all daytime observations, it’s important to have your eyes focused at infinity.
I’d love to hear about your own observations. Send reports to sjomeara31@gmail.com.