The smallest things in the universe are quarks, electrons, and neutrinos — fundamental particles that cannot be further divided into anything else, so far as we know. Going the opposite way, like Alice, galaxy clusters constitute nature’s largest entities. These star cities, bound by their mutual gravity, can span more than 100 million light-years.
The question is: Do galaxy clusters evolve over time? The answer should provide us with vital clues to the nature of the universe. After all, if the old steady state theory is correct, the cosmos should eternally appear more or less the same forever. Galaxies stretch into the distance while new ones form from the steady accumulation of tiny amounts of new material that pop into existence out of empty space, at a rate too small to be noticed.
Bringing the universe to your door. We’re excited to announce Astronomy magazine’s new Space and Beyond subscription box - a quarterly adventure, curated with an astronomy-themed collection in every box.
Learn More >>.
This theory’s competitor, the Big Bang, also says material pops out of nothingness — except that it was a one-shot deal during a titanic event 13.8 billion years ago. A major observational difference between these views is that, according to the Big Bang, we should only see young galaxies when we look far away, glimpsing those whose light left long ago when galaxies first formed. By contrast, according to the steady state theory, the universe would display a mixture of old and new galaxies at all distances since the cosmos, by this thinking, should appear the same everywhere.
So much evidence favors the Big Bang, however, that virtually no one buys the steady state theory anymore. One of the avenues of evidence is that, sure enough, galaxies do look different at great distances as we gaze at the light generated by long-ago events. Distant vistas display skimpier galaxy clusters and more spiral members because galaxy collisions take time. Those mergers produce the giant elliptical galaxies we see closer to us, thereby marking more recent events in the cosmological evolution.
Moreover, long-ago galaxies naturally have younger stars, which appear blue, and this paints distant galaxies with an azure glow. (Actually, they don’t visually seem blue because the redshift caused by the stretching of space makes them paradoxically look redder than nearby galaxies. But we can easily subtract this effect to determine their true prior-to-redshift color.)
All of this is simple enough, which is why a particular faraway galaxy cluster — CLG J02182–05102, found in 2010 — is so puzzling.
CLG (as we’ll mercifully abbreviate it) is composed of 60 members, including several colossal, intensely red galaxies at its center. These are true heavyweights, each populated by about 10 times more stars than reside in our Milky Way.
Such massive galaxies with ancient red stars should not exist in the early universe. Enormous galaxies need eons to develop. They create stars from their own hydrogen gas and also by slowly cannibalizing other galaxies.