In the 1960s and 1970s, the Apollo Moon program struggled with a minuscule, yet formidable enemy: sticky lunar dust. Four decades later, a new study reveals that forces compelling lunar dust to cling to surfaces — ruining scientific experiments and endangering astronauts’ health — change during the lunar day with the elevation of the Sun.
The study analyzes the interactions on the Moon among electrostatic adhesive forces, the angle of incidence of the Sun’s rays, and lunar gravity. It concludes that the stickiness of lunar dust on a vertical surface changes as the Sun moves higher in the sky, eventually allowing the very weak lunar gravity to pull the dust off.
The study has been accepted for publication in Geophysical Research Letters, a publication of the American Geophysical Union (AGU).
“Before you can manage the dust, you have to understand what makes it sticky,” said Brian O’Brien, the sole author of the paper. His analysis is the first to measure the strength of lunar dust’s adhesive forces, how they change during the lunar day — which lasts 708 hours — and how they differ on vertical and horizontal surfaces. O’Brien used data from the matchbox-sized Dust Detector Experiments deployed on the Moon’s surface in 1969 during the Apollo 11 and Apollo 12 missions.
Lunar dust has long been described as the No. 1 environmental hazard on the Moon. It causes miscellaneous havoc: from destroying scientific equipment deployed on the lunar surface (dusty surfaces absorb more sunlight and make devices overheat) to creating blinding dust clouds that interfere with lunar landings. It also may be a health hazard to space travelers because dust clinging to space suits detaches when astronauts reenter their lunar module. It then floats free in zero gravity, ready to be inhaled, during the 3-day journey back to Earth.
Lunar dust particles are minuscule, with an average size of 70 micrometers, the thickness of a human hair. The particles gain a positive charge through photoelectric effects that are caused by powerful solar ultraviolet radiation and X rays (the thin lunar atmosphere does not attenuate solar radiation). The UV radiation and X rays generate strong electrostatic adhesive forces that compel the specks of dust to cling to surfaces of scientific instruments and space suits.
In his new study, O’Brien analyzed the behavior of dust on horizontal and vertical solar cells in one of the Apollo dust-detecting experiments. On the first morning of the experiment, the lunar module — 426 feet (130 meters) away from the dust detector — took off from the Moon’s surface. The blast of exhaust gases completely cleansed a dusty horizontal solar cell because only a weak early-morning light illuminated it; thus the adhesive force of dust was faint. But the blast removed only half the dust covering the vertical cell because the cell’s surface faced east — into more intense sunlight — and thus the sticky forces were stronger.
O’Brien found that later, as the Sun rose and the angle of incidence of the Sun’s rays on the dusty vertical surface facing east decreased, the electrostatic forces on the vertical cell weakened. The tipping point was reached when the Sun was at an angle of about 45 degrees. Then the pull of lunar gravity counteracted the adhesive forces and made the dust start falling off. All dust had fallen by lunar night.
“These are the first measurements of the collapse of the cohesive forces that make lunar dust so sticky,” O’Brien said.
In 1965, NASA selected O’Brien, an Australian physicist who was then a professor of space science at Rice University in Houston to be the principal investigator in one of seven lunar experiments designed for the Apollo program. O’Brien started researching lunar dust in 1966 because he feared for an instrument he developed that the Apollo 14 mission was to leave behind. He worried that the device, which measured the flux of charged particles, would end up covered in dust and ruined. Lunar dust is “a bloody nuisance,” he says.
In 1970, O’Brien published a paper that he says proved that rocket exhaust gases from the Apollo 11 lunar module had lofted dust and debris, which then coated the surface of a lunar seismometer – the first instrument deployed by human hands on a celestial body. The seismometer then overheated and failed after 3 weeks’ operation. An official 1969 NASA report was incorrect in stating that no contamination had occurred, O’Brien said.
But it wasn’t until late 2006, when O’Brien learned from NASA’s web site that the space agency had misplaced data tapes from its dust-detecting experiments, that he decided to revisit his own set of 173 tapes. NASA had sent him these tapes one by one in 1969 and 1970 when he was working at the Department of Physics at the University of Sydney. He took them with him when, in 1971, he moved to Perth for a new job. O’Brien’s tapes are now the only known record of data from those vintage experiments.
Working alone and self-funded, the 75-year-old scientist dedicated 2 years to analyzing paper charts printed out in 1969 and 1970 from the magnetic tapes, which contain 6 million measurements, most of them yet to be analyzed.
For future Moon and Mars missions, O’Brien offers a practical solution to the dust hazard: Use a wide Sun-proof shed to block the rays that enhance dust’s adhesive forces.
“Getting closer to understanding the physics of the lunar dust problems means moving one giant step towards management of the hazards,” O’Brien said.
