Eric Agol from the University of Washington suggests that potentially habitable planets orbiting white dwarfs could be much easier to find, if they exist, than other exoplanets located so far.
White dwarfs, cooling stars believed to be in the final stage of life, typically have about 60 percent of the mass of the Sun, but by volume they are only about the size of Earth. Though born hot, they eventually become cooler than the Sun and emit just a fraction of its energy, so the habitable zones for their planets are significantly closer than Earth is to the Sun.
“If a planet is close enough to the star, it could have a stable temperature long enough to have liquid water at the surface — if it has water at all — and that’s a big factor for habitability,” Agol said.
A planet so close to its star could be observed using an Earth-based telescope, as small as 3.2 feet (1 meter) across, as the planet passes in front of and dims the light from the white dwarf, he said.
White dwarfs evolve from stars like the Sun. When such a star’s core can no longer produce nuclear reactions that convert hydrogen to helium, it starts burning hydrogen outside the core. That begins the transformation to a red giant, with a greatly expanded outer atmosphere that typically envelops and destroys any planets as close as Earth.
Finally, the star sheds its outer atmosphere, leaving the glowing, gradually cooling, core as a white dwarf, with a surface temperature around 9000° Fahrenheit (5000° Celsius). At that point, the star produces heat and light in the same way as a dying fireplace ember, though the star’s ember could last for 3 billion years.
Once the red giant sheds its outer atmosphere, more distant planets that were beyond the reach of that atmosphere could begin to migrate closer to the white dwarf, Agol said. New planets also possibly could form from a ring of debris left behind by the star’s transformation.
In either case, a planet would have to move very close to the white dwarf to be habitable, perhaps 500,000 to 2 million miles (800,000 to 3.2 million kilometers) from the star. That’s less than 1 percent of the distance from Earth to the Sun (93 million miles [150 million km]) and substantially closer than Mercury is to the Sun.
“From the planet, the star would appear slightly larger than our Sun because it is so close and slightly more orange, but it would look very, very similar to our Sun,” Agol said.
The planet also would be tidally locked, so the same side would always face the star and the opposite side would always be in darkness. The likely areas for habitation, he said, might be toward the edges of the light zone, nearer the dark side of the planet.
The nearest white dwarf to Earth is Sirius B at a distance of about 8.5 light-years — a light-year is about 6 trillion miles (10 trillion km). It is believed to once have been 5 times more massive than the Sun, but now it has about the same mass as the Sun packed into the same volume as Earth.
Agol is proposing a survey of the 20,000 white dwarfs closest to Earth. Using a 1-meter ground telescope, he said, one star could be surveyed in 32 hours of observation. If there is no telltale dimming of light from the star in that time, it means no planet orbiting closely enough to be habitable is passing in front of the star so that it is easily observable from Earth. Ideally, a network of telescopes that would make successive observations of a white dwarf as it progresses through the sky could carry out the work.
“This could take a huge amount of time, even with such a network,” Agol said.
The same work could be accomplished by larger specialty telescopes, such as the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope that is planned for operations later this decade in Chile. If it turns out that the number of white dwarfs with potential earthlike planets is small — say one in 1,000 — that telescope still would be able to track them down efficiently.
Finding an earthlike planet around a white dwarf could provide a meaningful place to look for life, Agol said.
Eric Agol from the University of Washington suggests that potentially habitable planets orbiting white dwarfs could be much easier to find, if they exist, than other exoplanets located so far.
White dwarfs, cooling stars believed to be in the final stage of life, typically have about 60 percent of the mass of the Sun, but by volume they are only about the size of Earth. Though born hot, they eventually become cooler than the Sun and emit just a fraction of its energy, so the habitable zones for their planets are significantly closer than Earth is to the Sun.
“If a planet is close enough to the star, it could have a stable temperature long enough to have liquid water at the surface — if it has water at all — and that’s a big factor for habitability,” Agol said.
A planet so close to its star could be observed using an Earth-based telescope, as small as 3.2 feet (1 meter) across, as the planet passes in front of and dims the light from the white dwarf, he said.
White dwarfs evolve from stars like the Sun. When such a star’s core can no longer produce nuclear reactions that convert hydrogen to helium, it starts burning hydrogen outside the core. That begins the transformation to a red giant, with a greatly expanded outer atmosphere that typically envelops and destroys any planets as close as Earth.
Finally, the star sheds its outer atmosphere, leaving the glowing, gradually cooling, core as a white dwarf, with a surface temperature around 9000° Fahrenheit (5000° Celsius). At that point, the star produces heat and light in the same way as a dying fireplace ember, though the star’s ember could last for 3 billion years.
Once the red giant sheds its outer atmosphere, more distant planets that were beyond the reach of that atmosphere could begin to migrate closer to the white dwarf, Agol said. New planets also possibly could form from a ring of debris left behind by the star’s transformation.
In either case, a planet would have to move very close to the white dwarf to be habitable, perhaps 500,000 to 2 million miles (800,000 to 3.2 million kilometers) from the star. That’s less than 1 percent of the distance from Earth to the Sun (93 million miles [150 million km]) and substantially closer than Mercury is to the Sun.
“From the planet, the star would appear slightly larger than our Sun because it is so close and slightly more orange, but it would look very, very similar to our Sun,” Agol said.
The planet also would be tidally locked, so the same side would always face the star and the opposite side would always be in darkness. The likely areas for habitation, he said, might be toward the edges of the light zone, nearer the dark side of the planet.
The nearest white dwarf to Earth is Sirius B at a distance of about 8.5 light-years — a light-year is about 6 trillion miles (10 trillion km). It is believed to once have been 5 times more massive than the Sun, but now it has about the same mass as the Sun packed into the same volume as Earth.
Agol is proposing a survey of the 20,000 white dwarfs closest to Earth. Using a 1-meter ground telescope, he said, one star could be surveyed in 32 hours of observation. If there is no telltale dimming of light from the star in that time, it means no planet orbiting closely enough to be habitable is passing in front of the star so that it is easily observable from Earth. Ideally, a network of telescopes that would make successive observations of a white dwarf as it progresses through the sky could carry out the work.
“This could take a huge amount of time, even with such a network,” Agol said.
The same work could be accomplished by larger specialty telescopes, such as the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope that is planned for operations later this decade in Chile. If it turns out that the number of white dwarfs with potential earthlike planets is small — say one in 1,000 — that telescope still would be able to track them down efficiently.
Finding an earthlike planet around a white dwarf could provide a meaningful place to look for life, Agol said.
